摘要: Evaluation in spatial planning, like planning itself, and general, is transition. Traditionally, evaluation has been an integral part of the rational process (Alexander, 1992.a: 74–75, 82–85). But, with demise “classic” model as dominant paradigm, what will be role future? What can we learn from our discussion about new kinds evaluations methods that are emerging to replace systematic past?
springer.com
sci-hub.st 参考文章(32)
Ernest R. Alexander, How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice ,(1995)
John Friedmann, Retracking America;: A theory of transactive planning ,(1973)
Andreas Faludi, Arnold Van Der Valk, Rule and Order, Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century 0792326199. ,(1994) , 10.1007/978-94-017-2927-7
Jürgen Habermas, Thomas McCarthy, The Theory of Communicative Action ,(1981)
A.K.F. Faludi, E.R. Alexander, Planning Doctrine: Its Uses and Implications Planning Theory. ,vol. 16, pp. 9- 53 ,(1996)
Tore Sager, Communicative planning theory Ashgate Publishing. ,(1994)
Ernest R. Alexander, Approaches to Planning: Introducing Current Planning Theories, Concepts and Issues ,(1992)
Nathaniel Lichfield, Community impact evaluation Planning Theory. ,(1994)
John Forester, Planning In the Face of Conflict: Negotiation and Mediation Strategies in local Land Use Regulation Journal of The American Planning Association. ,vol. 53, pp. 303- 314 ,(1987) , 10.1080/01944368708976450
E R Alexander, Doing the ‘Impossible’: Notes for a General Theory of Planning Environment and Planning B-planning & Design. ,vol. 25, pp. 667- 680 ,(1998) , 10.1068/B250667