Can the TAG derivation tree represent a semantic graph? An answer in the light of Meaning-Text Theory

摘要: From the parsing point of view, derivation tree in TAG [hereafter DT] is seen as "history" but also a linguistic representation, closer to semantics, that can be basis further analysis. Because elementary trees are lexicalized and localize predicate-arguments relations, several works have compared DT structure involving dependencies between lexical items (RJ92; RVW95). We agree with these authors there divergences syntactic dependencies, we show here — sense (SS94) viewed semantic dependency graph, namely SemS for Meaning-Text Theory [MTT] (ZM67; M88). This requires predicate-argument cooccurrence principle constraints on adjunction predicative auxiliary trees. briefly introduce representation levels MTT before studying shown by DT.