Analysis of the Basic Science Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination From 2014 to 2019.

作者: Mathias P. G. Bostrom , Michael B. Cross , Ajay Premkumar , Tony S. Shen , Drake G. Lebrun

DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00862

关键词:

摘要: INTRODUCTION The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), produced by the American Academy of Surgeons (AAOS), plays an important role in educational mission orthopaedic residency programs nationwide. An up-to-date understanding this examination is critical for to develop appropriate curriculum and individuals identify learning resources. This study presents updated analysis basic science section OITE from 2014 2019. METHODS All questions 2019 were reviewed. Each question was categorized topic taxonomy. use radiographic images or other clinical media recorded. reference analyzed bibliometric factors. Pearson chi-square tests used as statistical comparison. RESULTS In total, 185 1,600 over 6-year period (11.6%). proportion ranged 10.7% 12.0% year year. most frequently tested topics cellular molecular biology (23.8%), physiology/pathophysiology (16.8%), pharmacology (10.8%). There increase number biostatistics 2017 compared with 2016 (P = 0.02). common taxonomic category knowledge recall (89.7%). A total 383 references cited 122 sources. 3 sources accounting 44.4% all citations AAOS. DISCUSSION accounts approximately 11% questions, taxonomy being Recent have emphasized biostatistics, highlighting importance incorporating into education. Reference materials AAOS highly section.

参考文章(19)
Henry J. Mankin, The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 75, pp. 108- 116 ,(1971) , 10.1097/00003086-197103000-00014
Michael B. Cross, Daryl C. Osbahr, Denis Nam, Keith R. Reinhardt, Mathias P.G. Bostrom, Joshua S. Dines, An Analysis of the Hip and Knee Reconstruction Section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Orthopedics. ,vol. 34, ,(2011) , 10.3928/01477447-20110714-10
J A Buckwalter, R Schumacher, J P Albright, R R Cooper, Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 56, pp. 115- 121 ,(1981) , 10.1097/00001888-198102000-00006
David R Marker, Dawn M LaPorte, Thorsten M Seyler, Slif D Ulrich, Mike S McGrath, Frank J Frassica, Michael A Mont, Orthopaedic journal publications and their role in the preparation for the orthopaedic in-training examination. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 91, pp. 59- 66 ,(2009) , 10.2106/JBJS.I.00559
Frank J. Frassica, Derek Papp, Edward McCarthy, Kristy Weber, Analysis of the Pathology Section of the OITE Will Aid in Trainee Preparation Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 466, pp. 1323- 1328 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11999-008-0235-2
Jeffrey D. Seybold, Ramesh C. Srinivasan, James A. Goulet, Paul J. Dougherty, Analysis of the orthopedic in-training examination (OITE) musculoskeletal trauma questions. Journal of Surgical Education. ,vol. 69, pp. 8- 12 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JSURG.2011.06.003
Ramesh C. Srinivasan, Jeffery D. Seybold, Anish R. Kadakia, Analysis of the foot and ankle section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). Foot & Ankle International. ,vol. 30, pp. 1060- 1064 ,(2009) , 10.3113/FAI.2009.1060
Gregg R. Klein, Matthew S. Austin, Susan Randolph, Peter F. Sharkey, Alan S. Hilibrand, Passing the Boards: can USMLE and Orthopaedic in-Training Examination scores predict passage of the ABOS Part-I examination? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 86, pp. 1092- 1095 ,(2004) , 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00032
Matthew D Karam, J L Marsh, Does a Trauma Course Improve Resident Performance on the Trauma Domain of the OITE Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 92, ,(2010) , 10.2106/JBJS.J.00368