Training the ACRIN 6666 Investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis.
作者： Wendie A. Berg , Jeffrey D. Blume , Jean B. Cormack , Ellen B. Mendelson
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7324
关键词:
摘要: OBJECTIVE. Qualification tasks in mammography and breast ultrasound were developed for the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 Investigators. We sought to assess effects feedback on interpretive performance agreement BI-RADS feature analysis among a subset these experienced observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. After 1-hour didactic session BI-RADS: Ultrasound, an skills quiz set 70 orthogonal sets images including 25 (36%) malignancies was presented 100 imaging Thirty-five observers reviewed twice: first without then with immediate consensus analysis, management recommendations, pathologic truth. Observer (sensitivity, specificity, area under curve [AUC]) calculated feedback. Kappas determined assessments. RESULTS. For 35 feedback, ...
sci-hub.se 参考文章(49)
V. Corsetti, A. Ferrari, M. Ghirardi, R. Bergonzini, S. Bellarosa, O. Angelini, C. Bani, S. Ciatto, Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts Radiologia Medica. ,vol. 111, pp. 440- 448 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11547-006-0040-5
Helmut Madjar, Mary Rickard, Jack Jellins, Rainer Otto, IBUS Guidelines for the Ultrasonic Examination of the Breast European Journal of Ultrasound. ,vol. 9, pp. 99- 102 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0929-8266(99)00016-6
Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Diana L. Miglioretti, Robert Rosenberg, Robert J. Reid, Stephen H. Taplin, Berta M. Geller, Karla Kerlikowske, Physician workload in mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 190, pp. 526- 532 ,(2008) , 10.2214/AJR.07.2500
E A Morris, D D Dershaw, L Liberman, A F Abramson, F B Squires, J R Glassman, The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 171, pp. 35- 40 ,(1998) , 10.2214/AJR.171.1.9648759
J A Baker, P J Kornguth, M S Soo, R Walsh, P Mengoni, Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 172, pp. 1621- 1625 ,(1999) , 10.2214/AJR.172.6.10350302
Thomas M. Kolb, Jacob Lichy, Jeffrey H. Newhouse, Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations Radiology. ,vol. 225, pp. 165- 175 ,(2002) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2251011667
E Wenkel, M Heckmann, M Heinrich, S Schwab, M Uder, R Schulz-Wendtland, W Bautz, R Janka, Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren. ,vol. 180, pp. 804- 808 ,(2008) , 10.1055/S-2008-1027563
F.K.W. Schaefer, I. Heer, P.J. Schaefer, C. Mundhenke, S. Osterholz, B.M. Order, N. Hofheinz, J. Hedderich, M. Heller, W. Jonat, I. Schreer, Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. European Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 77, pp. 450- 456 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.EJRAD.2009.08.026
Wendie A. Berg, Carl J. D’Orsi, Valerie P. Jackson, Lawrence W. Bassett, Craig A. Beam, Rebecca S. Lewis, Philip E. Crewson, Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology. ,vol. 224, pp. 871- 880 ,(2002) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2243011626
Edward A. Sickles, Dulcy E. Wolverton, Katherine E. Dee, Performance Parameters for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography: Specialist and General Radiologists Radiology. ,vol. 224, pp. 861- 869 ,(2002) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2243011482