Regulation of private pensions : a case study of the UK

作者: E. Philip Davis

DOI: 10.3406/ECOFI.2000.4513

关键词:

摘要: There are three economic justifications to the regulation of pension funds : information asymmetries, a too important market power, and externalities (due systemic risk). In this article, author thinks that English is adequate. JEL Classifications G23, G28

参考文章(21)
A. G. Shepherd, Pension fund investment ,(1988)
E. Philip Davis, Zvi Bodie, The foundations of pension finance Research Papers in Economics. ,(2000)
Loree Bykerk, James B. Johnson, Private Pensions and Public Policies Southeastern Political Review. ,vol. 28, pp. 55- 76 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1747-1346.2000.TB00567.X
David Blake, Issues in pension funding ,(1992)
David Blake, Financial Market Analysis ,(1999)
William Jack Baumol, Contestable markets: an uprising in the theory of industry structure The American Economic Review. ,vol. 72, pp. 1- 15 ,(1982)
Philip Booth, Yakoub Yakoubov, Investment Policy for Defined-Contribution Pension Scheme Members Close to Retirement The North American Actuarial Journal. ,vol. 4, pp. 1- 19 ,(2000) , 10.1080/10920277.2000.10595892
Robert C. Merton, Zvi Bodie, Pension Benefit Guarantees in the United States: A Functional Analysis Social Science Research Network. ,(1993)
Richard V. Burkhauser, Zvi Bodie, Olivia S. Mitchell, John A. Turner, Securing employer-based pensions : an international perspective Industrial and Labor Relations Review. ,vol. 50, pp. 347- ,(1997) , 10.2307/2525094