Does effective climate policy require well-informed citizen support?

作者: Ekaterina Rhodes , Jonn Axsen , Mark Jaccard

DOI: 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2014.09.001

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Citizen support for climate policies is typically seen as an important criterion in policy making. Some studies of assume that a significant number citizens need to be aware the question and able provide informed opinions. In this study, we probe assumption using web-based survey residents Canadian province British Columbia (n = 475) by assessing: (1) citizen awareness knowledge policies, (2) different (3) relationship between support, (4) effect information provision on support. Our main finding most respondents are not any Columbia's have little understanding potential these reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Once they made types more likely express regulations, such zero-emissions electricity standard energy efficiency less carbon tax. Statistical analysis indicates associated with higher Furthermore, providing effectiveness our did translate into suggesting widespread well-informed necessarily required implementation effective policies.

参考文章(38)
Lindsey Lyons, Climate Action Plan Dickinson College. ,(2014)
George Cvetkovich, Ragnar Löfstedt, Social Trust and the Management of Risk Routledge. ,(1999) , 10.4324/9781315071350
Mark Jaccard, Jeffrey Simpson, Nic Rivers, Hot Air: Meeting Canada's Climate Change Challenge ,(2007)
Jan C. Semenza, David E. Hall, Daniel J. Wilson, Brian D. Bontempo, David J. Sailor, Linda A. George, Public Perception of Climate Change. Voluntary Mitigation and Barriers to Behavior Change American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 35, pp. 479- 487 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2008.08.020
Shalom H. Schwartz, Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1- 65 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Kathryn Harrison, A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada Review of Policy Research. ,vol. 29, pp. 383- 407 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1541-1338.2012.00565.X