Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy.
作者： Xin Kang , Teresa Cos , Meriem Guizani , Mieke M. Cannie , Valérie Segers
DOI: 10.1002/PD.4435
关键词:
摘要: Objective: To determine parental acceptance of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) involving postmortem imaging and organ tissue sampling compared with conventional to compare the acceptability percutaneous versus laparoscopic-guided biopsy. Methods: Following termination pregnancy parents were offered option traditional subsequently interviewed about their MIA. The McNemar test for paired samples was used assess difference in MIA autopsy. Wilcoxon signed-rank score Logistic regression selected study association different variables. Results: Conventional accepted by 42 (60.0%) 70 parents. Regression analysis showed that non-Muslim faith only factor significantly associated (p=0.030). Of 28 who initially refused autopsy, 13(46.4%) MIA, increasing 78.6% (p
ulb.ac.be
core.ac.uk
sci-hub.se 参考文章(18)
K. Ben-Sasi, L. S. Chitty, L. S. Franck, S. Thayyil, L. Judge-Kronis, A. M. Taylor, N. J. Sebire, Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals' views and implications for practice. Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 33, pp. 307- 312 ,(2013) , 10.1002/PD.4077
AEP Heazell, M-J McLaughlin, EB Schmidt, P Cox, V Flenady, TY Khong, S Downe, A difficult conversation? The views and experiences of parents and professionals on the consent process for perinatal postmortem after stillbirth British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 119, pp. 987- 997 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2012.03357.X
P A Boyd, Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study BMJ. ,vol. 328, pp. 137- 0 ,(2004) , 10.1136/BMJ.37939.570104.EE
S. Thayyil, L. S. Chitty, N. J. Robertson, A. M. Taylor, N. J. Sebire, Minimally invasive fetal postmortem examination using magnetic resonance imaging and computerised tomography: current evidence and practical issues Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 30, pp. 713- 718 ,(2010) , 10.1002/PD.2534
Madadin Mohammed, Magdy A. Kharoshah, Autopsy in Islam and current practice in Arab Muslim countries. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. ,vol. 23, pp. 80- 83 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JFLM.2014.02.005
P. H T Cartlidge, A. T Dawson, J. H Stewart, G. M Vujanic, Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths BMJ. ,vol. 310, pp. 155- 158 ,(1995) , 10.1136/BMJ.310.6973.155
S Addison, O J Arthurs, S Thayyil, Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice. British Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 87, pp. 20130621- 20130621 ,(2014) , 10.1259/BJR.20130621
M. Cannie, C. Votino, PH. Moerman, R. Vanheste, V. Segers, K. Van Berkel, M. Hanssens, X. Kang, T. Cos, M. Kir, L. Balepa, L. Divano, W. Foulon, J. De Mey, J. Jani, Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 39, pp. 659- 665 ,(2012) , 10.1002/UOG.10079
M A Weber, J W Pryce, M T Ashworth, M Malone, N J Sebire, Histological examination in sudden unexpected death in infancy: evidence base for histological sampling. Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 65, pp. 58- 63 ,(2012) , 10.1136/JCLINPATH-2011-200224
Sanne J. Gordijn, Jan Jaap H. M. Erwich, T. Yee Khong, Value of the Perinatal Autopsy: Critique Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. ,vol. 5, pp. 480- 488 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S10024-002-0008-Y