Small evidence for small incisions: pediatric laparoscopy and the need for more rigorous evaluation of novel surgical therapies.

作者: Shawn J Rangel , Marion C.W Henry , Mary Brindle , R.Lawrence Moss

DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00491-3

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Background/purpose Laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted for many pediatric surgical diseases its potential to reduce morbidity and hospital stay. To date, no study examined the qualitative state of evidence supporting use these techniques in children. The authors present a systematic objective review this evidence. Methods identified all clinical reports during last 10 years 3 most common managed laparoscopically (appendicitis, gastroesophageal reflux, conditions requiring splenectomy). Standardized previously validated quality assessment instruments were used examine individual studies 4 areas: (1) relevance, (2) generalizability practice, (3) reporting methodology, (4) strength conclusions. Results evaluated total 131 (39 48 per disease). Ninety-three percent retrospective, with single institution case accounting majority Only 23% control group any kind. Randomized trials comprised 3% (4 studies). Forty-five nonrandomized found be poor quality, 55% fair by epidemiologic standards. distribution scores was not significantly different between operative indications (analysis variance P =0.10). also methodologic standardized criteria. Conclusions current body is insufficient justify widespread adoption laparoscopic into accepted standards care. Wider prospective such as multicenter databases randomized are needed clarify outcomes innovative techniques. Significant improvement published observational warranted, may facilitated guidelines specific data.

参考文章(16)
Stefan Sauerland, Thomas Jaschinski, Edmund AM Neugebauer, Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 11, ,(2010) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.PUB3
R.Lawrence Moss, The CONSORT statement: Progress in clinical research in pediatric surgery. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. ,vol. 36, pp. 1739- 1742 ,(2001) , 10.1053/JPSU.2001.28809
Robert Golub, Fazi Siddiqui, Dieter Pohl, Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Metaanalysis Journal of The American College of Surgeons. ,vol. 186, pp. 545- 553 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00080-5
Shawn J. Rangel, R. Lawrence Moss, The Need for Critical Analysis of Case-Series Reporting in Pediatric Surgery Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. ,vol. 11, pp. 184- 189 ,(2002) , 10.1053/SPSU.2002.33743
R.Lawrence Moss, Marion C.W. Henry, Reed A. Dimmitt, Shawn Rangel, Nora Geraghty, Erik D. Skarsgard, The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: state of the art? Journal of Pediatric Surgery. ,vol. 36, pp. 1182- 1186 ,(2001) , 10.1053/JPSU.2001.25749
William D. Hardin, Steven Stylianos, Kevin P. Lally, Evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. ,vol. 34, pp. 908- 913 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0022-3468(99)90396-2
David Moher, Alison Jones, Leah Lepage, for the CONSORT Group, Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials: A Comparative Before-and-After Evaluation JAMA. ,vol. 285, pp. 1992- 1995 ,(2001) , 10.1001/JAMA.285.15.1992
Thomas C. Chalmers, Harry Smith, Bradley Blackburn, Bernard Silverman, Biruta Schroeder, Dinah Reitman, Alexander Ambroz, A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 2, pp. 31- 49 ,(1981) , 10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8
Shawn J. Rangel, Jennifer Kelsey, Christopher E. Colby, JoDee Anderson, R.Lawrence Moss, Development of a quality assessment scale for retrospective clinical studies in pediatric surgery Journal of Pediatric Surgery. ,vol. 38, pp. 390- 396 ,(2003) , 10.1053/JPSU.2003.50114