Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation.

作者: Kamran Mahalati , Philip Belitsky , Ingrid Sketris , Kenneth West , Romauld Panek

DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199907150-00011

关键词:

摘要: Background Cyclosporine (CsA) dosing is traditionally based on trough blood levels (C0) rather than area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), although AUC correlates better with posttransplantation clinical events. For Neoral, limited sampling closely full 12-hr AUC. The purpose of our study was to correlate C0 CsA at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr after dose (PK0-4) compare this in predicting acute rejection (AR) cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (CsANT) de novo first kidney transplant patients. Methods PK0-4 done 2-4 days starting Neoral for 156 All received CsA-based triple-drug immunosuppression without antibody induction. calculated as projected (AUC0-12) actual 4-hr (AUC0-4) from using parallel trapezoid rule. not retrospectively compared a predictor AR CsANT during 90 days. Results correlated poorly AUC0-12 AUC0-4 (r=0.61 r=0.42). (mean+/-SEM) were significantly different 34 patients 109 (293+/-21 vs. 294+/-11 microg/L, P=0.95). lower (AUC0-12 9090+/-598 10608+/-336 microg x h/L, P=0.01; 3934+/-306 4802+/-166 microg.h/L, P=0.006). In stepwise regression analysis only or (P=0.03/P=0.02) delayed graft function (P=0.007) predicted AR. AUC0-12, AUC0-4, all higher 11746+/-650 10023+/-301 5270+/-358 4474+/-150 343+/-18 287+/-10 P=0.01), but an independent CsANT. Patients range 9500 11500 h/L between 4400 5500 had lowest incidence (13% 7%, respectively) risk Conclusion PK0-4. Early more associated C0. Our data suggest that target 9500-11500 4400-5500 may provide optimal immunosuppression.

参考文章(25)
M. Oellerich, V. W. Armstrong, B. Kahan, L. Shaw, D. W. Holt, R. Yatscoff, A. Lindholm, P. Halloran, K. Gallicano, K. Wonigeit, E. Schütz, H. Schran, T. Annesley, Lake Louise Consensus Conference on cyclosporin monitoring in organ transplantation: report of the consensus panel. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. ,vol. 17, pp. 642- 654 ,(1995) , 10.1097/00007691-199512000-00017
Anders Lindholm, Barry D Kahan, Influence of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, trough concentrations, and AUC monitoring on outcome after kidney transplantation Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 54, pp. 205- 218 ,(1993) , 10.1038/CLPT.1993.132
J.H. Hong, N. Sumrani, V. Delaney, R. Davis, A. Dibenedetto, K.M.H. Butt, Causes of late renal allograft failure in the ciclosporin era Nephron. ,vol. 62, pp. 272- 279 ,(1992) , 10.1159/000187058
GÖRAN KLINTMALM, JULIETTE SÄWE, OLLE RINGDÉN, CHRISTER VON BAHR, ANITA MAGNUSSON, Cyclosporine plasma levels in renal transplant patients. Association with renal toxicity and allograft rejection. Transplantation. ,vol. 39, pp. 132- 137 ,(1985) , 10.1097/00007890-198502000-00005
Gary Barone, Cheng Tao Chang, M. Gerry Choc, Jon B. Klein, Christopher L. Marsh, John A. Meligeni, David I. Min, Mark D. Pescovitz, Raymond Pollak, Timothy L. Pruett, James B. Stinson, John S. Thompson, Eva Vasquez, Thomas Waid, Duane G. Wombolt, Robert L. Wong, THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF A MICROEMULSION FORMULATION OF CYCLOSPORINE IN PRIMARY RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS1 Transplantation. ,vol. 61, pp. 875- 880 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00007890-199603270-00005
John M. Kovarik, Edgar A. Mueller, Klaus Kutz, Johannes B. Van Bree, Wolfgang Tetzloff, Reduced inter- and intraindividual variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. ,vol. 83, pp. 444- 446 ,(1994) , 10.1002/JPS.2600830336
BERTRAM L. KASISKE, KAREN HEIM-DUTHOY, K. VENKATESWARA RAO, WALID M. AWNI, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CYCLOSPORINE PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS AND SUBSEQUENT ACUTE REJECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS Transplantation. ,vol. 46, pp. 716- 721 ,(1988) , 10.1097/00007890-198811000-00017
Gary Barone, C. Martin Bunke, M. Gerry Choc, Donald E. Hricik, Judy Hyun-Ju Jin, Jon B. Klein, Christopher L. Marsh, David I. Min, Mark D. Pescovitz, Raymond Pollak, Timothy L. Pruett, James B. Stinson, John S. Thompson, Eva Vasquez, Thomas Waid, Duane G. Wombolt, Robert L. Wong, The safety and tolerability of cyclosporine emulsion versus cyclosporine in a randomized, double-blind comparison in primary renal allograft recipients Transplantation. ,vol. 61, pp. 968- 970 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00007890-199603270-00021
D. Abendroth, B. Buchholz, W. Land, G. May, M. Wiesel, L. Farber, A. Korn, A. Maibucher, Comparison of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Neoral vs Sandimmun in de novo renal transplant patients over 24 months' treatment International Congress of the Transplantation Society. ,vol. 29, pp. 275- 276 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0041-1345(96)00091-7