Rethinking Ripeness Theory: Explaining Progress and Failure in Civil War Negotiations in the Philippines and Colombia

作者: Colin Walch

DOI: 10.1163/15718069-12341325

关键词:

摘要: How can ripeness theory be extended to explain when and why parties remain at the negotiating table until an agreement is reached? Existing crucial in understanding conflicting consider negotiation as preferable continued fighting. However, factors which may stay after start of process – that is, how ripe moment sustained has been reached are not well elaborated. This study seeks extend argues organizationally fragmented rebel groups less flexible make concessions unlikely reached, especially there a lack cohesion between military political branches. argument explored through structured focused comparison peace negotiations Colombia Philippines with communist groups.

参考文章(34)
Desiree Nilsson, Partial Peace Rebel Groups Inside and Outside Civil War Settlements Social Science Research Network. ,(2008)
Andrew Bennett, Alexander L. George, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences ,(2005)
Faten Ghosn, Getting to the Table and Getting to Yes: An Analysis of International Negotiations International Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 54, pp. 1055- 1072 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1468-2478.2010.00626.X
Terry Beitzel, Jennifer Dougherty, Review of Doing Research: Methods of Inquiry for Conflict Analysis (Daniel Druckman, Sage 2005) Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University. ,(2006)
Brian R. Urlacher, Political Constraints and Civil War Conflict Resolution Civil Wars. ,vol. 13, pp. 81- 98 ,(2011) , 10.1080/13698249.2011.576134
Marieke Kleiboer, Ripeness of Conflict: A Fruitful Notion? Journal of Peace Research. ,vol. 31, pp. 109- 116 ,(1994) , 10.1177/0022343394031001009
Macartan Humphreys, None, Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: Uncovering the Mechanisms Journal of Conflict Resolution. ,vol. 49, pp. 508- 537 ,(2005) , 10.1177/0022002705277545
Brian R. Urlacher, Negotiating with Insurgents: Changing Perceptions or Changing Politics? International Negotiation. ,vol. 18, pp. 177- 194 ,(2013) , 10.1163/15718069-12341252