Detectability of choledocholithiasis on CT: The effect of positive intraduodenal enteric contrast on portovenous contrast-enhanced studies.

作者: AmrM Ajlan , Benoît Mesurolle , Lawrence Stein , Ellen Kao , Giovanni Artho

DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.164184

关键词:

摘要: Background/Aim: To retrospectively assess the accuracy of intravenous (IV) contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) in choledocholithiasis detectability, presence and absence positive intraduodenal contrast. Patients Methods: Over a 3-year period, patients whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed within week from portovenous (PV)-enhanced abdominal were identified. The final cohort consisted 48 studies which entire common bile duct (CBD) length visualized (19 males, 29 females; mean age, 68 years). We identified two groups according to (n = 31) or 17) section thickness ranged 1.25 5 mm. Two radiologists, blinded clinical information ERCP results, independently evaluated images. Direct CBD stone visualization assessed previously predefined criteria, correlating with original electronic reports using findings as reference standard. A third reader reviewed all discordant results. diagnostic performances both observers interobserver agreement calculated for groups. Results: 77%–88% sensitivity, 50%–71% specificity, 71%–74% obtained group without contrast, versus 50%–80% 57%–71% 59%–71% With exception predictive value (PPV), performance parameters decreased contrast group, mostly affecting negative (NPV) (71%–78% vs 50%–67%). Conclusion: PV-enhanced MDCT has moderate detection. trend decreasing noted

参考文章(20)
R L Baron, R J Stanley, J K Lee, R E Koehler, G L Melson, D M Balfe, P J Weyman, A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography. Radiology. ,vol. 145, pp. 91- 98 ,(1982) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.145.1.7122903
Marcia Irene F. Canto, Amitabh Chak, Thomas Stellato, Michael V. Sivak, Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ,vol. 47, pp. 439- 448 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70242-1
RL Baron, CA Rohrmann, SP Lee, WP Shuman, SA Teefey, CT evaluation of gallstones in vitro: correlation with chemical analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 151, pp. 1123- 1128 ,(1988) , 10.2214/AJR.151.6.1123
K Brakel, J S Laméris, H G Nijs, O T Terpstra, G Steen, B C Blijenberg, Predicting gallstone composition with CT: in vivo and in vitro analysis. Radiology. ,vol. 174, pp. 337- 341 ,(1990) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.174.2.2296642
RB Jeffrey, MP Federle, FC Laing, S Wall, J Rego, AA Moss, Computed tomography of choledocholithiasis. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 140, pp. 1179- 1183 ,(1983) , 10.2214/AJR.140.6.1179
W. Wermke, H.-J. Schulz, Sonographische Diagnostik von Gallenwegskonkrementen Ultraschall in Der Medizin. ,vol. 8, pp. 116- 120 ,(2008) , 10.1055/S-2007-1011672
I. Jiménez Cuenca, L. del Olmo Martínez, M. Pérez Homs, Helical CT without contrast in choledocholithiasis diagnosis. European Radiology. ,vol. 11, pp. 197- 201 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S003300000609
Frank H. Miller, Caroline M. Hwang, Helena Gabriel, Lori A. Goodhartz, Anees J. Omar, Willis G. Parsons, Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT of Choledocholithiasis American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 181, pp. 125- 130 ,(2003) , 10.2214/AJR.181.1.1810125
C Reinhold, P Taourel, P M Bret, G A Cortas, S N Mehta, A N Barkun, L Wang, F Tafazoli, Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology. ,vol. 209, pp. 435- 442 ,(1998) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.209.2.9807570
Stephan W. Anderson, Brian C. Lucey, Jose C. Varghese, Jorge A. Soto, Accuracy of MDCT in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 187, pp. 174- 180 ,(2006) , 10.2214/AJR.05.0459