Macroscopic Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Resection Specimen: Clinical Significance of the Pathologist in Quality Control

作者: Iris D Nagtegaal , Cornelis JH van de Velde , Erik van der Worp , Ellen Kapiteijn , Phil Quirke

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.010

关键词:

摘要: PURPOSE: Quality assessment and assurance are important issues in modern health care. For the evaluation of surgical procedures, there indirect parameters such as complication, recurrence, survival rates. These limited value for individual surgeon, is an obvious need direct parameters. We have evaluated criteria by which pathologists can judge quality or completeness resection specimen a randomized trial rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pathology reports all patients entered onto Dutch multicenter were reviewed. All participating had been instructed workshops videos order to obtain standardized work-up. A three-tiered classification was applied assess total mesorectal excision (TME). Prognostic this tested using log-rank analysis Kaplan-Meier curves data who did not receive any adjuvant treatmen...

参考文章(14)
R.J Heald, R.D.H Ryall, Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The Lancet. ,vol. 327, pp. 1479- 1482 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2
I.J Adam, I.G Martin, Pj Finan, D Johnston, M.O Mohamdee, N Scott, M.F Dixon, P Quirke, Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer The Lancet. ,vol. 344, pp. 707- 711 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92206-3
Geoffrey A. Porter, Colin L. Soskolne, Walter W. Yakimets, Stephen C. Newman, Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 227, pp. 157- 167 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00001
P. Hermanek, W. Hohenberger, The importance of volume in colorectal cancer surgery European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO). ,vol. 22, pp. 213- 215 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0748-7983(96)80004-7
L Blomqvist, C Rubio, T Holm, M Machado, T Hindmarsh, Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen British Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 72, pp. 18- 23 ,(1999) , 10.1259/BJR.72.853.10341684
A Lehander Martling, T Holm, L-E Rutqvist, BJ Moran, RJ Heald, B Cedermark, Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm The Lancet. ,vol. 356, pp. 93- 96 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02469-7
E. Kapiteijn, C.A.M. Marijnen, A.C. Colenbrander, E. Klein Kranenbarg, W.H. Steup, J.H.J.M. van Krieken, J.C. van Houwelingen, J.W.H. Leer, C.J.H. van de Velde, Local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 1992: a population-based study in the west Netherlands Ejso. ,vol. 24, pp. 528- 535 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0748-7983(98)93500-4
RGH Beets-Tan, GL Beets, RFA Vliegen, AGH Kessels, H Van Boven, A De Bruine, MF von Meyenfeldt, CGMI Baeten, JMA van Engelshoven, Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. The Lancet. ,vol. 357, pp. 497- 504 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04040-X