Amplification of frog calls by leaf substrates: implications for terrestrial and arboreal species

作者: Matías I. Muñoz , Wouter Halfwerk

DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.02.361840

关键词:

摘要: Signal detection is a minimum requirement for any communicative interaction. Acoustic signals, however, often experience amplitude losses during their transmission through the environment, reducing range. Displaying from sites that increase of sound produced, such as cavities or some reflective surfaces, can improve detectability signals by distant receivers. Understanding how display influence production is, far understood. We measured effect leaf calling on calls an arboreal (Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni) and leaf-litter specialist (Silverstoneia flotator) frog species. collected leaves where males both species were observed calling, conducted playback experiments to measure calls. Overall, used H. fleischmanni S. flotator similar dimensions, amplified each about 5.0 2.5 dB, respectively. The degree call amplification was unrelated dimensions position frogs leaves, but explained different frequency content Depending spatial location intended unintended receivers, we suggest could represent either benefit impose costs terrestrial argue microhabitat substrate which animals needs be considered when addressing signal evolution. Lay summaryAnimals produce specific locations in yet know surprisingly little effects small-scale habitat animal communication. Here show are they use sites. consequences this enhancement need relation (males females) receivers (predators parasites).

参考文章(36)
Michael J. Ryan, Nicole M. Kime, Selection on Long-Distance Acoustic Signals Acoustic Communication. pp. 225- 274 ,(2003) , 10.1007/0-387-22762-8_5
Henrik Brumm, Hans Slabbekoorn, Acoustic Communication in Noise Advances in The Study of Behavior. ,vol. 35, pp. 151- 209 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S0065-3454(05)35004-2
Ken Marten, Peter Marler, Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 2, pp. 271- 290 ,(1977) , 10.1007/BF00299740
Joshua J. Schwartz, Raymond Hunce, Brandon Lentine, Kristi Powers, Calling site choice and its impact on call degradation and call attractiveness in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 70, pp. 1- 19 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S00265-015-2016-8
H. C. Bennet-Clark, The Tuned Singing Burrow of Mole Crickets The Journal of Experimental Biology. ,vol. 128, pp. 383- 409 ,(1987) , 10.1242/JEB.128.1.383
M. D. TUTTLE, M. J. RYAN, Bat Predation and the Evolution of Frog Vocalizations in the Neotropics Science. ,vol. 214, pp. 677- 678 ,(1981) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.214.4521.677
R. Haven Wiley, Douglas G. Richards, Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 3, pp. 69- 94 ,(1978) , 10.1007/BF00300047
Jesse Delia, Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia, Jonathan Whitney, Rene Murrieta-Galindo, Observations on the Reproductive Behavior of a Neotropical Glassfrog, Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni (Anura: Centrolenidae) South American Journal of Herpetology. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 12 ,(2010) , 10.2994/057.005.0101
T. G. FORREST, From Sender to Receiver: Propagation and Environmental Effects on Acoustic Signals Integrative and Comparative Biology. ,vol. 34, pp. 644- 654 ,(1994) , 10.1093/ICB/34.6.644
Mark A. Bee, Alejandro Vélez, James D. Forester, Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 131, pp. 4188- 4195 ,(2012) , 10.1121/1.3699271