Understanding Adverse Events: A Human Factors Framework

作者: Ronda G Hughes , Kerm Henriksen , Elizabeth Dayton , Margaret A Keyes , Pascale Carayon

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: The complex and demanding clinical environment of nurses can be made a bit more understandable easier in which to deliver care by accounting for wide range human factors concerns that directly indirectly impact performance. Human is the application scientific knowledge about strengths limitations design systems work ensure safe satisfying A framework such as portrayed Figure 1 helps us become aware salient components their relationships shape influence quality provided patients. concept error somewhat loaded term. Rather than falling into trap uncritically focusing on searching individuals blame, approach attempts identify contributing substandard performance find ways better detect, recover from, or preclude problems could result harm Starting with individual characteristics providers knowledge, skills, sensory/physical capabilities, we examined hierarchy system factors, including nature performed, physical environment, human-system interfaces, organizational/social management, external factors. In our current fragmented health system, where no single entity charge, these multiple seem continuously misaligned interact manner leads care. These are proverbial accidents waiting happen. Nurses serve critical role at point patient care; they an excellent position not only problems, but help problems-behind-the-problems. actively practice tenets high-reliability organizations. It recognized, course, nursing cannot address all its own. Everyone who has potential care, matter how remote (e.g., device manufacturers, administrators, nurse managers), needs mindful interdependent play shaping. Without clear strong voice organizational climate conducive candidly addressing efforts improve safety will fall short potential.

参考文章(11)
John G. Reiling, Barbara L. Knutzen, Thomas K. Wallen, Susan McCullough, Ric Miller, Sonja Chernos, Enhancing the traditional hospital design process: a focus on patient safety. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. ,vol. 30, pp. 115- 124 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30013-4
Beth Swann-D'Emilia, James C.H. Chu, Joanne Daywalt, Misadministration of prescribed radiation dose Medical Dosimetry. ,vol. 15, pp. 185- 191 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0958-3947(90)90005-3
Baruch Fischhoff, Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. ,vol. 1, pp. 288- 299 ,(1975) , 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288
C. Vincent, S. Taylor-Adams, N. Stanhope, Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine BMJ. ,vol. 316, pp. 1154- 1157 ,(1998) , 10.1136/BMJ.316.7138.1154
Pascale Carayon, Michael J Smith, Work organization and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics. ,vol. 31, pp. 649- 662 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00040-5
Robert L. Wears, Marc Berg, Computer Technology and Clinical Work: Still Waiting for Godot JAMA. ,vol. 293, pp. 1261- 1263 ,(2005) , 10.1001/JAMA.293.10.1261
Frank R. Hendrickson, Precision in radiation oncology International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 8, pp. 311- 312 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0360-3016(82)90534-X
J Carthey, J T Reason, M R de Leval, Diagnosing "vulnerable system syndrome": an essential prerequisite to effective risk management BMJ Quality & Safety. ,vol. 10, ,(2001) , 10.1136/QHC.0100021.
K Henriksen, Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning Quality & Safety in Health Care. ,vol. 12, ,(2003) , 10.1136/QHC.12.SUPPL_2.II46
Kerm Henriksen, Elizabeth Dayton, Organizational silence and hidden threats to patient safety. Health Services Research. ,vol. 41, pp. 1539- 1554 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1475-6773.2006.00564.X