The preliminary results of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain secondary to spinal stenosis: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial.

作者: Ramsin Benyamin , Laxmaiah Manchikanti , Kimberly A Cash , Vidyasagar Pampati , Carla D McManus

DOI: 10.36076/PPJ.2009/12/E341

关键词:

摘要: Background Lumbar surgery and epidural injections for spinal stenosis are the most commonly performed interventions in United States. However, there is only moderate evidence to effectiveness of caudal injections. The next sequential step adhesiolysis hypertonic neurolysis with targeted delivery. There have not been any randomized trials evaluating percutaneous delivery local anesthetic, steroid sodium chloride solution lumbar stenosis. Study design A randomized, equivalence, controlled trial. Setting An interventional pain management practice, a specialty referral center, private practice setting Objectives To evaluate patients chronic low back lower extremity central compare fluoroscopically directed Methods Patients were randomly assigned one 2 groups 25 each group. Group I received catheterization up S3 0.9% solution, non-particulate betamethasone served as control II injection lidocaine, 10% Betamethasone formed intervention Randomization was by computer-generated random allocation sequence simple randomization. Outcomes assessment Multiple outcome measures utilized including Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI), employment status, opioid intake at 3, 6, 12 months post treatment. Significant relief described 50% or more, whereas significant improvement disability score defined reduction 40% more. Results This evaluation showed (>or= 50%) 76% year follow-up group compared 4% Limitations results this study limited lack placebo group, fact that it preliminary report, Conclusions With patients, utilizing steroids may be effective function-limiting

参考文章(73)
Lisha Barre, Grant Cooper, Daniel Southern, Gregory E Lutz, Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis: a restrospective evaluation of long term efficacy. Pain Physician. ,vol. 7, pp. 187- 193 ,(2004) , 10.36076/PPJ.2004/7/187
Marc A. Huntoon, Abram H. Burgher, Back to the future: the end of the steroid century? Pain Physician. ,vol. 11, pp. 713- ,(2008)
Pradeep Chopra, Pradeep Chopra, Andrea M. Trescot, Salahadin Abdi, David M. Schultz, Sukdeb Datta, Systematic review of effectiveness and complications of adhesiolysis in the management of chronic spinal pain: an update. Pain Physician. ,vol. 10, pp. 129- 146 ,(2007)
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Vidyasagar Pampati, Joshua A Hirsch, Howard S Smith, Vijay Singh, Analysis of growth of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population: a 10-year evaluation from 1997 to 2006. Pain Physician. ,vol. 12, pp. 9- 34 ,(2009) , 10.36076/PPJ.2009/12/9
Kenneth Botwin, Sanjiv Rao, Lee Ann Brown, Mark Fishman, Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spine stenosis. Pain Physician. ,vol. 10, pp. 547- 558 ,(2007)
Pampati, Manchikanti L, McManus Cd, Damron Ks, Brandon De, Rivera Jj, Wilson, One day lumbar epidural adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis in treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind trial. Pain Physician. ,vol. 7, pp. 177- 186 ,(2004) , 10.36076/PPJ.2004/7/177
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Kimberly A. Cash, Vidyasagar Pampati, Carla D. McManus, Salahadin Abdi, Preliminary results of a randomized, equivalence trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain: Part 4--Spinal stenosis. Pain Physician. ,vol. 11, pp. 833- 848 ,(2008)
M. Roland, D. J Torgerson, What are pragmatic trials BMJ. ,vol. 316, pp. 285- 285 ,(1998) , 10.1136/BMJ.316.7127.285