Development of a Modern Polymer Theory

作者: G. Allan Stahl

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2407-9_2

关键词:

摘要: When presenting the 1953 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to H. Staudinger, A. Fredga said, “In world of high polymers, almost everything was new and untested. Long standing concepts had be revised or ones created. The development macromolecular science does not present a picture peaceful idylls.” model polymer consisting long covalent chains its roots nineteenth century structural organic chemistry. Acceptance was, however, sidetracked early 1900’s by popularization colloid science. In 1920, characteristic properties molecular weight substances explained “association” forces. that year Staudinger published his classic, “Uber Polymerization”. Publication this paper heralded decade intense research and, at times, even more pitched controversy. story modern theory is an excellent case study formation confirmation hypothesis. made spicy intensity debate. One participant recently commented champions often argued with each other vigorously than defenders association theory.

参考文章(11)
Robert C. Olby, The path to the double helix ,(1974)
Raymond Benedict Seymour, History of polymer science and technology M. Dekker. ,(1982)
Paul J. Flory, Principles of polymer chemistry ,(1953)
J. H. Gladstone, Walter Hibbert, V. On the molecular weight of caoutchouc and other colloid bodies Philosophical Magazine Series 1. ,vol. 28, pp. 38- 42 ,(1889) , 10.1080/14786448908619825
Samuel Shrowder Pickles, LXXXIX.—The constitution and synthesis of caoutchouc Journal of The Chemical Society, Transactions. ,vol. 97, pp. 1085- 1090 ,(1910) , 10.1039/CT9109701085
Herman Mark, Polymer chemistry in Europe and America - How it all began Journal of Chemical Education. ,vol. 58, pp. 527- ,(1981) , 10.1021/ED058P527
O. Wallach, Zur Kenntniss der Terpene und der ätherischen Oele; Fünfte Abhandlung Justus Liebig's Annalen der Chemie. ,vol. 239, pp. 1- 54 ,(1887) , 10.1002/JLAC.18872390102
Claus Priesner, Zur Geschichte der makromolekularen Chemie Chemie in Unserer Zeit. ,vol. 13, pp. 43- 50 ,(1979) , 10.1002/CIUZ.19790130203