Against Conjunctive Properties

作者: Michele Paolini Paoletti

DOI: 10.1007/S12136-019-00413-0

关键词:

摘要: I put in question this article the existence of conjunctive properties. In second section, after having provided a characterization properties, develop an argument based on principle ontological parsimony: if we accept that there are properties universe then, ceteris paribus, our ontology turns out to be less ontologically parsimonious than reject them. Afterwards, third distinguish between maximalist and non-maximalist reductionist non-reductionist theories as well Such distinctions help clarify options at hand when accepting or rejecting light these distinctions, then tackle two objections against from parsimony. Finally, remaining sections, deal with arguments defended by D. M. Armstrong for properties: infinite complexity causal powers. show several ways resist their conclusion.

参考文章(18)
E. C. Barnes, Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle Erkenntnis. ,vol. 53, pp. 353- 374 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1026464713182
Chris Swoyer, Complex Predicates and Logics for Properties and Relations Journal of Philosophical Logic. ,vol. 27, pp. 295- 325 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1004234204990
Andrew Botterell, Mellor on Negative Properties The Philosophical Quarterly. ,vol. 48, pp. 523- 526 ,(1998) , 10.1111/1467-9213.00120
Albert Casullo, Conjunctive properties revisited Australasian Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 62, pp. 289- 291 ,(1984) , 10.1080/00048408412340073
Alex Byrne, D. H. Mellor, Matters of metaphysics ,(1991)
Jonathan Schaffer, What Not to Multiply Without Necessity Australasian Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 93, pp. 644- 664 ,(2015) , 10.1080/00048402.2014.992447
Ricki Leigh Bliss, Viciousness and the structure of reality Philosophical Studies. ,vol. 166, pp. 399- 418 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11098-012-0043-0