Follow-Up of Atypical Prostate Needle Biopsies Suspicious for Cancer

作者: Theresa Y Chan , Jonathan I Epstein

DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00510-X

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objectives. To determine both how the diagnosis of an atypical biopsy influences a urologist’s decision to repeat and outcome rebiopsy. Methods. Of 200 biopsies that we confirmed from outside consultations Johns Hopkins Hospital 1992 1993, were able retrieve follow-up information for 144 cases. Each was evaluated reason atypia (atrophic glands, rule out [r/o] adenosis, not otherwise specified [NOS; insufficient cytologic and/or architectural atypia], r/o prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia [PIN], inflammation, crush artifact) favored (cancerous, benign, undetermined). Results. biopsies, 92 rebiopsied (63.9%). The time initial rebiopsy ranged 0.5 months 3 years (63% less than 6 months; 39% months). Rebiopsy revealed carcinoma in 48.9%, benign 38%, 8.7%, PIN 4.4%. median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value lower men who did undergo (6 versus 7.8) (rank sum analysis, P = 0.04). No correlation found between PSA level results which cancer favored, 61% cancerous on 33% where process favored. three reasons seemed correlate with NOS (68% rebiopsy); inflammation adenosis (36% rebiopsy). Conclusions. Although 48.9% cases cancerous, only 63% underwent rebiopsy, raising concern cancers are being missed those after diagnosis. there trend serum this significant, even 4 ng/mL had risk histologic features foci may be useful as factors determining urgency they also statistically significant predicting outcome. Men diagnoses should regardless levels why lesions atypical.

参考文章(16)
Michael K. Brawer, Michael P. Chetner, Jeanette Beatie, David M. Buchner, Robert L. Vessella, Paul H. Lange, Screening for Prostatic Carcinoma with Prostate Specific Antigen The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 147, pp. 841- 845 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37401-3
Fernand Labrie, André Dupont, Raul Suburu, Leonello Cusan, Marjolaine Tremblay, José-Luis Gomez, Jean Emond, Serum prostate specific antigen as pre-screening test for prostate cancer. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 147, pp. 846- 851 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37402-5
David W. Keetch, William J. Catalona, Deborah S. Smith, Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 151, pp. 1571- 1574 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35304-1
Marcia L. Wills, Ulrike M. Hamper, Alan W. Partin, Jonathan I. Epstein, Incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in sextant needle biopsy specimens Urology. ,vol. 49, pp. 367- 373 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00622-X
Michael K. Brawer, Steven A. Bigler, Olof E. Sohlberg, Raymond B. Nagle, Paul H. Lange, Significance of prosttic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate needle biopsy Urology. ,vol. 38, pp. 103- 107 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(05)80067-6
William J. Ellis, Michael K. Brawer, Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it? The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 153, pp. 1496- 1498 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67444-5
Michael H. Weinstein, Jonathan I. Epstein, Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Human Pathology. ,vol. 24, pp. 624- 629 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90242-9
Michael K. Brawer, Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: A premalignant lesion Human Pathology. ,vol. 23, pp. 242- 248 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90104-B