作者: Sebastian Kufner , Salvatore Cassese , Marco Valeskini , Franz-Josef Neumann , Stefanie Schulz-Schüpke
DOI: 10.1016/J.JCIN.2015.01.031
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Objectives This study sought to investigate the long-term comparative efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB), stent (PES), or angioplasty (BA) for treatment drug-eluting restenosis. Background The optimal restenosis remains unknown. Although PEB has shown encouraging results, clinical poorly defined. Methods A total 402 patients with clinically significant in limus-eluting stents were randomly assigned receive (n = 137), PES 131), BA 134). For this analysis, versus compared. primary endpoints target lesion revascularization composite death myocardial infarction. Results At a median follow-up 3 years, risk was comparable (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 2.33; p = 0.11) lower (HR: 0.51, CI: 0.34 0.74; p Conclusions use as compared treat similar safety. superior BA. sustained without trade-off supports role option (Intracoronary Stenting Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis: Treatment Approaches [ISAR-DESIRE 3]; NCT00987324)