Restructuring, reminding and repair: what's missing from models of analogy

作者: John Wolstencroft

DOI: 10.3233/AIC-1989-2202

关键词:

摘要: Models of analogy developed to date fail consider all the stages analogical reasoning required for an effective model. Further, much emphasis is placed on structural, syntactic nature analogy. We describe a seven stage model analogy, and discuss four means determining similarity. In this context we review two prevalent contrasting approaches, conclude by offering suggestions that alleviate some problems currently faced, in form new which takes into account similarity constraints. An example Duncker's radiation problem used highlight deficiences with current models

参考文章(14)
Mark T. Keane, Mike Brayshaw, The Incremental Analogy Machine: A Computational Model of Analogy. EWSL. pp. 53- 62 ,(1988)
Mark T. Keane, Where's the Beef? The Absence of Pragmatic Factors in Pragmatic Theories of Analogy. european conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 327- 332 ,(1988)
George Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things ,(1987)
Brian Falkenhainer, Dedre Gentner, Kenneth D. Forbus, The structure-mapping engine national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 272- 277 ,(1986)
Jaime G. Carbonell, Derivational analogy: a theory of reconstructive problem solving and expertise acquisition Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.. pp. 727- 738 ,(1993)
Mary L. Gick, Keith J. Holyoak, Analogical problem solving Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 12, pp. 306- 355 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
Mary L. Gick, Keith J. Holyoak, Schema induction and analogical transfer Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1- 38 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
Dedre Gentner, Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* Cognitive Science. ,vol. 7, pp. 155- 170 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3