Regarding prep: Comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010).

作者: Ronald C. Serlin

DOI: 10.1037/A0019523

关键词:

摘要: The sense that replicability is an important aspect of empirical science led Killeen (2005a) to define prep, the probability a replication will result in outcome same direction as found current experiment. Since then, several authors have praised and criticized culminating 3 articles issue Psychological Methods. In this article, Killeen's prep reviewed, contributions are summarized discussed. An examination role measure theoretical support such acquisition knowledge leads me concur with Senn (2002) little epistemological value.

参考文章(31)
Roland Hall, The Locke newsletter Dept. of Philosophy, Lancaster University. ,(1970)
Arthur Walter Burks, Charles S. Peirce, Science and philosophy UMI Out-of-Print Books on Demand. ,(1958)
Herbert E. Robbins, An Empirical Bayes Approach to Statistics Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics. pp. 388- 394 ,(1956) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_26
Alan Hájek, Ned Hall, Induction and Probability The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. pp. 149- 172 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470756614.CH8
Willard Van Orman Quine, Two Dogmas of Empiricism ,(1951)
AnthonyG. Greenwald, Richard Gonzalez, Richard.J. Harris, Donald Guthrie, Effect sizes and p values: What should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology. ,vol. 33, pp. 175- 183 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1469-8986.1996.TB02121.X