Carrying the past to the future: Distinct brain networks underlie individual differences in human spatial working memory capacity.

作者: Siwei Liu , Jia-Hou Poh , Hui Li Koh , Kwun Kei Ng , Yng Miin Loke

DOI: 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2018.04.014

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Spatial working memory (SWM) relies on the interplay of anatomically separated and interconnected large-scale brain networks. EEG studies often observe load-associated sustained negative activity during SWM retention. Yet, whether how such in retention relates to network-specific functional activation/deactivation individual differences capacity remain be elucidated. To cover these gaps, we recorded concurrent EEG-fMRI data 70 healthy young adults Sternberg delayed-match-to-sample task with three load levels. a subset participants (N = 28) that performed properly had artefact-free fMRI data, employed novel temporo-spatial principal component analysis derive load-dependent slow wave (NSW) from retention-related event-related potentials. The associations between NSW responses were divergent higher (N = 14) lower groups. Specifically, larger load-related increase amplitude was associated greater for group but group. Furthermore, group, related activation bilateral parietal areas fronto-parietal network (FPN) deactivation medial frontal gyrus posterior mid-cingulate cortex default mode (DMN) In contrast, did not show similar pattern. Instead, linked right middle temporal gyrus. Our findings shed light possible differential EEG-informed neural mechanism maintenance underlying capacity.

参考文章(82)
Nitish V. Thakor, Shanbao Tong, Quantitative EEG analysis methods and clinical applications Artech House. ,(2009)
Edward F. Ester, Thomas C. Sprague, John T. Serences, Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory Neuron. ,vol. 87, pp. 893- 905 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.NEURON.2015.07.013
F. Roux, M. Wibral, H. M. Mohr, W. Singer, P. J. Uhlhaas, Gamma-band activity in human prefrontal cortex codes for the number of relevant items maintained in working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 32, pp. 12411- 12420 ,(2012) , 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0421-12.2012
Edward K. Vogel, Andrew W. McCollough, Maro G. Machizawa, Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature. ,vol. 438, pp. 500- 503 ,(2005) , 10.1038/NATURE04171
Edward K. Vogel, Maro G. Machizawa, Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity Nature. ,vol. 428, pp. 748- 751 ,(2004) , 10.1038/NATURE02447
Frédéric Roux, Peter J. Uhlhaas, Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha-gamma versus theta-gamma codes for distinct WM information? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ,vol. 18, pp. 16- 25 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.TICS.2013.10.010
James Z Chadick, Adam Gazzaley, Differential coupling of visual cortex with default or frontal-parietal network based on goals Nature Neuroscience. ,vol. 14, pp. 830- 832 ,(2011) , 10.1038/NN.2823
Sohee Park, Philip S Holzman, Schizophrenics Show Spatial Working Memory Deficits Archives of General Psychiatry. ,vol. 49, pp. 975- 982 ,(1992) , 10.1001/ARCHPSYC.1992.01820120063009
Alexander A. Stevens, Sarah C. Tappon, Arun Garg, Damien A. Fair, Functional Brain Network Modularity Captures Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation in Working Memory Capacity PLoS ONE. ,vol. 7, pp. e30468- ,(2012) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0030468
Kartik K. Sreenivasan, Clayton E. Curtis, Mark D’Esposito, Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ,vol. 18, pp. 82- 89 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.TICS.2013.12.001