Individual Differences in Cognitive Editing Standards

摘要: This study is aimed at understanding how people edit their own arguments prior to uttering them (Hample, 1984; Hample & Dallinger, 1985a, 1985b). The main categories of editorial criteria are effectiveness, principled objection type argument, person-centered issues, and discourse competence standards. Our purpose here begin an account what sort person prefers which criteria. Argumentativeness (Infante Rancer, 1982), verbal aggression Wigley, 1986), interpersonal orientation (Swap Rubin, 1983), respondent gender associated with use Results point two different approaches editing one's arguments. task focuses on taken by males, high in aggressiveness low orientation. relational females, argument avoidance Justification for using multiple instantiate each situations was also found.