Mandatory, fast, and fair: Case outcomes and procedural justice in a family drug court
作者： Melanie Fessinger , Katherine Hazen , Jamie Bahm , Jennie Cole-Mossman , Roger Heideman
DOI: 10.1007/S11292-019-09361-6
关键词:
摘要: Problem-solving courts are traditionally voluntary in nature to promote procedural justice and advance therapeutic jurisprudence. The Family Treatment Drug Court (FTDC) Lancaster County, Nebraska is a mandatory dependency court for families with allegations of child abuse or neglect related substance use. We conducted program evaluation examining parents’ case outcomes perceptions examine whether problem-solving could replicate the positive courts. employed quasi-experimental design that compared FTDC parents traditional (control parents). examined records gather orders, compliance outcomes, important dates. also 263 surveys (FTDC = 232; control = 31) understand process. Overall, were more compliant some orders than control parents. Although did not have significantly different cases closed faster cases. had higher Mediation analyses indicated believed process was fair therefore participated consistently court-ordered services reunified often Mandatory can serve through same mechanisms as More research necessary which specific elements courts, aside from nature, essential maintain their effectiveness.
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(56)
Mae C. Quinn, Whose team am i on anyway? Musings of a public defender about drug treatment court practice Review of law and social change. New York University. ,vol. 26, pp. 37- ,(2000)
Allison D. Redlich, The Past, Present, and Future of Mental Health Courts Springer New York. pp. 147- 161 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_9
Bruce J. Winick, Problem Solving Courts: Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Practice Springer, New York, NY. pp. 211- 236 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_12
M. Douglas Anglin, David Farabee, Michael Prendergast, The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation. ,(1998)
Sophia I. Gatowski, Shirley A. Dobbin, Alicia Summers, Exploring the Value-Added of Specialized Problem-Solving Courts for Dependency Cases Springer New York. pp. 33- 53 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_3
Bruce J. Winick, David B. Wexler, Drug Treatment Court: Therapeutic Jurisprudence Applied Touro law review. ,vol. 18, pp. 6- ,(2015)
Michael Rempel, Christine Depies Destefano, Predictors of engagement in court-mandated treatment: Findings at the Brooklyn Treatment Court, 1996-2000. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. ,vol. 33, pp. 87- 124 ,(2001) , 10.1300/J076V33N04_06
Bruce J. Winick, Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Problem Solving Courts Fordham Urban Law Journal. ,vol. 30, pp. 1055- ,(2003)
Arazais Oliveros, Joan Kaufman, Addressing substance abuse treatment needs of parents involved with the child welfare system Child Welfare. ,vol. 90, pp. 25- 41 ,(2011)
Yuen J. Huo, Tom R. Tyler, Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts ,(2002)