The impact of registration accuracy on imaging validation study design: A novel statistical power calculation.

作者: Eli Gibson , Aaron Fenster , Aaron D. Ward

DOI: 10.1016/J.MEDIA.2013.04.008

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Novel imaging modalities are pushing the boundaries of what is possible in medical imaging, but their signal properties not always well understood. The evaluation these novel critical to achieving research and clinical potential. Image registration accepted reference standard an important part characterizing elucidating effect underlying focal disease on signal. strengths conclusions drawn from analyses limited by statistical power. Based observation that this context, power depends uncertainty arising error, we derive a calculation formula relating number subjects, minimum detectable difference between normal pathologic regions for validation study design accommodates correlations within image regions. Monte Carlo simulations were used evaluate derived models test strength assumptions, showing model yielded predictions power, simulated experiments accurate maximum error 1% when assumptions derivation met, sensitivities violations assumptions. use formulae illustrated through subjects required case study, modeled closely after prostate cancer currently taking place at our institution. address three central questions studies: (1) What acceptable error? (2) How many needed? (3) regions?

参考文章(24)
Thomas Lumley, Paula Diehr, Scott Emerson, Lu Chen, The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health. ,vol. 23, pp. 151- 169 ,(2002) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.PUBLHEALTH.23.100901.140546
Peter A. Lachenbruch, Mark W. Lipsey, Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research. Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 85, pp. 1179- ,(1990) , 10.2307/2289636
Eli Gibson, Aaron Fenster, Aaron D. Ward, Registration accuracy: how good is good enough? a statistical power calculation incorporating image registration uncertainty medical image computing and computer assisted intervention. ,vol. 15, pp. 643- 650 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_79
Wendy J. M. van de Ven, Geert J. S. Litjens, Jelle O. Barentsz, Thomas Hambrock, Henkjan J. Huisman, Required Accuracy of MR-US Registration for Prostate Biopsies Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 92- 99 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-3-642-23944-1_10
Graeme Penney, Andreas Varnavas, Neville Dastur, Tom Carrell, An image-guided surgery system to aid endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms: description and initial clinical experience international conference information processing. pp. 13- 24 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-3-642-21504-9_2
Stela Pudar Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Iztok Hozo, Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 5, pp. 13- 13 ,(2005) , 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
Arthur E. Mace, Sample-Size Determination. ,(1964)
M.H. Loew, C.E. Rodriguez-Carranza, Technical issues in multimodality medical image registration computer based medical systems. pp. 2- 7 ,(1998) , 10.1109/CBMS.1998.701198