Imperfect detection and the determination of environmental flows for fish: challenges, implications and solutions

作者: Daniel C. Gwinn , Leah S. Beesley , Paul Close , Ben Gawne , Peter M. Davies

DOI: 10.1111/FWB.12684

关键词:

摘要: Summary Relationships between river flow characteristics and fish community/population dynamics (i.e. flow–ecology relationships) underpin methods to determine monitor environmental water allocations. Quantifying these relationships can be difficult, consequently, most strategies for conservation in Australian rivers are based on general as opposed statistical predictions. Of those studies that have investigated fish, not accounted incomplete variable detection of by the sampling methods, thus making implicit assumption efficiency is invariant. This important rarely met, leading inconsistent research findings spurious results, a reliance generic principles defining management strategies. We illustrate how when probability varies freshwater consequences scientific inference about fish–flow relationships. Methods accounting imperfect identified tools increase experimental designs while reducing cost discussed. These include borrowing information among components simulation techniques optimise designs. We argue that, due very nature quantify (e.g. at different magnitudes/regimes), challenge detectability particularly relevant science. We encourage broader adoption account improve successful application flows managing communities.

参考文章(51)
Frédéric Archaux, Pierre-Yves Henry, Olivier Gimenez, When can we ignore the problem of imperfect detection in comparative studies Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 3, pp. 188- 194 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.2041-210X.2011.00142.X
Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita, Martin S. Ridout, Byron J. T. Morgan, Design of occupancy studies with imperfect detection Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 1, pp. 131- 139 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.2041-210X.2010.00017.X
MICHAEL J. BRADFORD, PAUL S. HIGGINS, JOSH KORMAN, JEFF SNEEP, Test of an environmental flow release in a British Columbia river: does more water mean more fish? Freshwater Biology. ,vol. 56, pp. 2119- 2134 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2427.2011.02633.X
C. Finch, W.  E. Pine, C.  B. Yackulic, M.  J. Dodrill, M. Yard, B.  S. Gerig, L.  G. Coggins, J. Korman, Assessing Juvenile Native Fish Demographic Responses to a Steady Flow Experiment in a Large Regulated River River Research and Applications. ,vol. 32, pp. 763- 775 ,(2016) , 10.1002/RRA.2893
M. J. Dodrill, C. B. Yackulic, B. Gerig, W. E. Pine, J. Korman, C. Finch, DO MANAGEMENT ACTIONS TO RESTORE RARE HABITAT BENEFIT NATIVE FISH CONSERVATION? DISTRIBUTION OF JUVENILE NATIVE FISH AMONG SHORELINE HABITATS OF THE COLORADO RIVER River Research and Applications. ,vol. 31, pp. 1203- 1217 ,(2015) , 10.1002/RRA.2842
Matthew Vincent Lauretta, Edward Vincent Camp, William Earl Pine, Thomas Kerry Frazer, Catchability model selection for estimating the composition of fishes and invertebrates within dynamic aquatic ecosystems Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. ,vol. 70, pp. 381- 392 ,(2013) , 10.1139/CJFAS-2012-0319
J. Robert Britton, Josephine Pegg, Rodolphe E. Gozlan, Quantifying imperfect detection in an invasive pest fish and the implications for conservation management Biological Conservation. ,vol. 144, pp. 2177- 2181 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2011.05.008
Matt A. Hangsleben, Micheal S. Allen, Daniel C. Gwinn, Evaluation of Electrofishing Catch per Unit Effort for Indexing Fish Abundance in Florida Lakes Transactions of The American Fisheries Society. ,vol. 142, pp. 247- 256 ,(2013) , 10.1080/00028487.2012.730106