作者: Justin Kenrick , Jerome Lewis
DOI: 10.1111/J.0268-540X.2004.00256.X
关键词:
摘要: In the July 2003 issue of Current Anthropology, Adam Kuper vehemently attacked indigenous peoples’ movement, claiming it to be retrograde, anti-progressive and right wing. He has given these views extensive publicity by speaking on BBC radio having his article reprinted in New Humanist, illustrated a cartoon that forcefully equates struggles with European fascism (Kuper 2003b, 2003). As an analysis international movement particular situations certain peoples, Kuper’s polemic is misleading number ways, would perhaps better ignored. However, as example potential academic arguments can have reinforce discourse serves conceal discrimination against such must taken seriously. Its for ‘spin’ confirmed recent explicit implicit promotion conclusions organizations wishing justify actions may conflict rights people. 1