Olfactory cues and the value of information: voles interpret cues based on recent predator encounters

作者: Sonny S. Bleicher , Hannu Ylönen , Teemu Käpylä , Marko Haapakoski

DOI: 10.1007/S00265-018-2600-9

关键词:

摘要: Prey strategically respond to the risk of predation by varying their behavior while balancing tradeoffs food and safety. We present here an experiment that tests way same indirect cues are interpreted bank voles, Myodes glareolus, as game changes through exposure a caged weasel. Using optimal patch use, we asked wild-caught voles rank they perceived. measured response olfactory in form weasel bedding, sham control rabbit odor-free control. repeated interviews chronological order test change response, i.e., value information. found did not differentiate strongly between treatments pre-exposure During exposure, vole foraging activity was reduced all treatments, but proportionally increased vicinity odor. Post-exposure, focused control, predator explained majority variation response. Our data also suggested sex bias interpretation cues. Given how foragers changed based on external information, suggest applying simulation needs further testing. For instance, what possible effective compounds “fear” over time. The major conclusion is however may be, presence live predators overwhelmingly affects information gained from these In ecology, strategic animal senses its environment. suggesting existence weighed individual against probability encounter with perceived lethality predator. best documented such tenacity giving-up density. this paper, show cue smell interspecific competitor result different responses experience live-caged This work provides cautionary example making assumptions regarding devoid environmental context.

参考文章(79)
J.S. Brown, Ecology of Fear Reference Module in Life Sciences#R##N#Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior. pp. 581- 587 ,(2010) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00303-X
Hannu Ylönen, Jana A. Eccard, Adaptive food choice of bank voles in a novel environment: choices enhance reproductive status in winter and spring Annales Zoologici Fennici. ,vol. 43, pp. 2- 8 ,(2006)
Ashael Raveh, Burt P. Kotler, Zvika Abramsky, Boris R. Krasnov, Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils Ecology Letters. ,vol. 14, pp. 47- 51 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2010.01549.X
Amos Bouskila, Joel S. Brown, Burt P. Kotler, Shomen Mukherjee, Justin R. St. Juliana, The foraging response of gerbils to a gradient of owl numbers Evolutionary Ecology Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 869- 878 ,(2011)
Marko Haapakoski, Janne Sundell, Hannu Ylönen, Predation risk and food: opposite effects on overwintering survival and onset of breeding in a boreal rodent Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 81, pp. 1183- 1192 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2656.2012.02005.X
Maximilian Drakeley, Oriol Lapiedra, Jason J. Kolbe, Predation Risk Perception, Food Density and Conspecific Cues Shape Foraging Decisions in a Tropical Lizard PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, pp. e0138016- ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0138016
Miguel A. Bedoya-Perez, Alexandra J. R. Carthey, Valentina S. A. Mella, Clare McArthur, Peter B. Banks, A practical guide to avoid giving up on giving-up densities Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 67, pp. 1541- 1553 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00265-013-1609-3