摘要: By following the admirable advice embodied in above remarks. Alvin Plantinga has produced an original and important study of ontological argument. Plantinga’s treatment is marked by intriguing turn — God Other Minds [12] he examines a number variants argument concludes that they arc one all unsuccessful; but his more recent The Nature Necessity [13] God, Freedom, Evil [14], offers what takes to be sound In follows, I shall survey evaluate on these matters.
springer.com
sci-hub.st 参考文章(20)
Alvin Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil ,(1974)
Theodore Hailperin, Logics without existence assumptions Almqvist & Wiksell. ,(1968) , 10.2307/2273023
James E. Tomberlin, Frank McGuinness, God, Evil, and the Free Will Defence Religious Studies. ,vol. 13, pp. 455- 475 ,(1977) , 10.1017/S0034412500010350
J. Michael Dunn, Nuel D. Belnap, The substitution interpretation of the quantifiers Noûs. ,vol. 2, pp. 177- ,(1968) , 10.2307/2214704
Donald Davidson, Truth and Meaning Synthese. ,vol. 17, pp. 93- 111 ,(1967) , 10.1007/978-94-009-2727-8_5
Hugues Leblanc, Theodore Hailperin, Nondesignating singular terms The Philosophical Review. ,vol. 68, pp. 239- ,(1959) , 10.2307/2182169
Nino B. Cocchiarella, Some Remarks on Second Order Logic with Existence Attributes Noûs. ,vol. 2, pp. 165- ,(1968) , 10.2307/2214703
Robert Merrihew Adams, The Nature of Necessity (A. Plantinga) Noûs. ,vol. 11, pp. 175- ,(1977) , 10.2307/2214545
David Lewis, Anselm and Actuality Noûs. ,vol. 4, pp. 175- ,(1970) , 10.2307/2214320
Tyler Burge, Truth and singular terms Noûs. ,vol. 8, pp. 309- ,(1974) , 10.2307/2214437