Sex-Relevance of Content and Influenceability

作者: Stuart A. Karabenick

DOI: 10.1177/0146167283092008

关键词:

摘要: Previous studies of conformity as a function the sex-relevance task content were criticized for not including appropriate control conditions. Experiment I used original Sistrunk and McDavid questionnaire obtained results suggesting that knowledge differences might have produced effects they ascribed to conformity. In 2 contemporary was devised assess degree with design controlled differences. Persons (266 males 285 females) responded statements either accompanied by fictitious majority response or not. There no overall sex difference in response. Rather, influence varied item content: Males influenced more feminine, females masculine content. However, moderating relatively small compared across all Knowledge conditions suggested soci...

参考文章(8)
Alice H. Eagly, Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 85, pp. 86- 116 ,(1978) , 10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.86
Carlos Goldberg, Sex Roles, Task Competence, and Conformity The Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 86, pp. 157- 164 ,(1974) , 10.1080/00223980.1974.9923898
Peter A. Lachenbruch, Jacob Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 84, pp. 1096- 1097 ,(1989) , 10.2307/2290095
Frank Sistrunk, John W. McDavid, Sex variable in conforming behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 17, pp. 200- 207 ,(1971) , 10.1037/H0030382
Judy C. Morelock, Sex differences in susceptibility to social influence Sex Roles. ,vol. 6, pp. 537- 548 ,(1980) , 10.1007/BF00287884
Harris M. Cooper, STATISTICALLY COMBINING INDEPENDENT STUDIES: A META-ANALYSIS OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN CONFORMITY RESEARCH Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 37, pp. 131- 146 ,(1979) , 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.131