Validity of self-reported mammography: examining recall and covariates among older women in a Health Maintenance Organization.

作者: L. S. Caplan

DOI: 10.1093/AJE/KWF202

关键词:

摘要: Self-reports of screening are frequently used in place chart abstraction, particularly outpatient settings, because they generally less expensive and provide the only information available. The authors expanded literature on validation self-reported mammography by including validity recall assessing covariates a setting where women were examined more than once. In 1995, this study validated use sample 949 aged 50-80 years who members health maintenance organization with centralized automated records mammographic examinations. majority had mammogram within previous 2 according to self-reports records, but rates exceeded record 8.2%. Sensitivity was high (93.8%), whereas specificity low (53.6%). overall agreement between 82.7%. kappa value 0.52, indicating fair beyond chance. Modeling logistic regression revealed that being college graduate having first-degree relative breast cancer significantly associated accurate recall. Comparison actual time interval data disagreements consisted largely women's underestimates since their last screening. These results add knowledge about settings screened

参考文章(16)
Lucina Suarez, Daniel A. Goldman, Nancy S. Weiss, Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 11, pp. 94- 98 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30483-5
David Haber, Guide to clinical preventive services: a challenge to physician resourcefulness Clinical Gerontologist. ,vol. 12, pp. 17- 29 ,(1993) , 10.1300/J018V12N03_03
Sallie A. Newell, Afaf Girgis, Rob W. Sanson-Fisher, Nina J. Savolainen, The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population: a critical review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 17, pp. 211- 229 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00069-0
E S King, B K Rimer, B Trock, A Balshem, P Engstrom, How valid are mammography self-reports? American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 80, pp. 1386- 1388 ,(1990) , 10.2105/AJPH.80.11.1386
Lori A. Crane, Celia P. Kaplan, Roshan Bastani, Susan C.M. Scrimshaw, Determinants of Adherence Among Health Department Patients Referred for a Mammogram Women & Health. ,vol. 24, pp. 43- 64 ,(1996) , 10.1300/J013V24N02_03
N. P. Gordon, R. A. Hiatt, D. I. Lampert, Concordance of Self-reported Data and Medical Record Audit for Six Cancer Screening Procedures Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 85, pp. 566- 570 ,(1993) , 10.1093/JNCI/85.7.566
KATHERINE M NEWTON, ANDREA Z LaCROIX, SUZANNE G LEVEILLE, CAROLYN RUTTER, NORA L KEENAN, LYNDA A ANDERSON, None, Women's Beliefs and Decisions About Hormone Replacement Therapy Journal of Womens Health. ,vol. 6, pp. 459- 465 ,(1997) , 10.1089/JWH.1997.6.459
D Degnan, R Harris, J Ranney, D Quade, J A Earp, J Gonzalez, Measuring the use of mammography: two methods compared. American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 82, pp. 1386- 1388 ,(1992) , 10.2105/AJPH.82.10.1386
Jacob Cohen, A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales Educational and Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 20, pp. 37- 46 ,(1960) , 10.1177/001316446002000104
Steven S Coughlin, Linda W Pickle, Marc T Goodman, Lynne R Wilkens, The logistic modeling of interobserver agreement Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 45, pp. 1237- 1241 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90164-I