On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma implementation

作者: U. Dinesh Kumar , David Nowicki , José Emmanuel Ramírez-Márquez , Dinesh Verma

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJPE.2007.02.002

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Six Sigma is at the top of agenda for many companies that try to reduce cost and improve productivity. Many manufacturing implement thousands projects every year this implementation demands a significant investment capital requires careful analysis make sure benefits obtained are much higher than actual investment. This benefit crucial, especially whose products have small profit margin. In paper, two optimization models will assist management choose process improvement opportunities presented. These consider multi-stage, asynchronous with opportunity quality (scrap rework rates) each stages. The first model maximizing sigma level under constraint while selection alternatives maximize returns considered by second model. Process usually results in costs associated purchase new technology, modification existing equipment, training employees, hiring employees information technology infrastructure. proposed recognize company competes funds can result either improved revenue or reduction costs. An example illustrates application developed show some scenarios implementing may not be financially beneficial.

参考文章(31)
Alan Bowman, Josef Schmee, Estimating sensitivity of process capability modeled by a transfer function Journal of Quality Technology. ,vol. 36, pp. 223- 239 ,(2004) , 10.1080/00224065.2004.11980267
Bill Robinson, Build a Management System Based on Six Sigma Six Sigma Forum Magazine. ,vol. 5, ,(2005)
Rath Strong, Thomas Bertels, Rath & Strong's Six Sigma Leadership Handbook ,(2003)
JOSE E. RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ, DAVID W. COIT, ABDULLAH KONAK, Redundancy allocation for series-parallel systems using a max-min approach Iie Transactions. ,vol. 36, pp. 891- 898 ,(2004) , 10.1080/07408170490473097
Celik Parkan, Ming-Lu Wu, Comparison of three modern multicriteria decision-making tools International Journal of Systems Science. ,vol. 31, pp. 497- 517 ,(2000) , 10.1080/002077200291082
Gerald J. Hahn, William J. Hill, Roger W. Hoerl, Stephen A. Zinkgraf, The Impact of Six Sigma Improvement—A Glimpse into the Future of Statistics The American Statistician. ,vol. 53, pp. 208- 215 ,(1999) , 10.1080/00031305.1999.10474462
E LIU, Clinical Research the Six Sigma Way Journal of Laboratory Automation. ,vol. 11, pp. 42- 49 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JALA.2005.10.003
Donald W. Moorman, On the quest for Six Sigma. American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 189, pp. 253- 258 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2004.11.027
Sally Lanyon, At Raytheon Six Sigma works, too, to improve HR management processes Journal of Organizational Excellence. ,vol. 22, pp. 29- 42 ,(2003) , 10.1002/NPR.10088
Jiju Antony, Ricardo Banuelas, None, Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program Measuring Business Excellence. ,vol. 6, pp. 20- 27 ,(2002) , 10.1108/13683040210451679