Practical seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry historical buildings

作者: Stylianos I. Pardalopoulos , Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou , Christos E. Ignatakis

DOI: 10.12989/EAS.2016.11.2.195

关键词:

摘要: Rehabilitation of historical unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings is a priority in many parts the world, since those are living part history and testament human achievement era their construction. Many these still operational; comprising brittle materials with no reinforcements, spatially distributed mass stiffness, they not encompassed by current seismic assessment procedures that have been developed for other structural types. To facilitate difficult task selecting proper rehabilitation strategy - often restricted international treaties non-invasiveness reversibility intervention given practical requirements buildings' intended reuse, this paper presents procedure demands URM mainly constructions lack well-defined diaphragm action. A key ingredient method approximation spatial shape lateral translation, Phi, building assumes when subjected to uniform field acceleration. Using Phi as 3-D function, dynamic response system evaluated, using concepts SDOF continuous systems. This enables determination envelope deformations tendency deformation damage localization throughout examined design earthquake scenario. Deformation specified terms relative drift ratios referring in-plane out-of-plane building's elements. Drift ratio compared capacities associated predefined performance limits. The accuracy introduced evaluated through (a) comparison profiles obtained from detailed time-history analysis suite ten strong ground motion records, five which near-field characteristics, (b) evaluation results observations reported reconnaissance reports two neoclassical torsionally-sensitive buildings, located Thessaloniki, Greece, survived major past.

参考文章(7)
Linda Giresini, Massimo Fragiacomo, Paulo B. Lourenço, Comparison between rocking analysis and kinematic analysis for the dynamic out‐of‐plane behavior of masonry walls Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. ,vol. 44, pp. 2359- 2376 ,(2015) , 10.1002/EQE.2592
S. Bracchi, M. Rota, A. Penna, G. Magenes, Consideration of modelling uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by equivalent-frame approach Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. ,vol. 13, pp. 3423- 3448 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10518-015-9760-Z
Barbara Borzi, Helen Crowley, Rui Pinho, Simplified Pushover-Based Earthquake Loss Assessment (SP-BELA) Method for Masonry Buildings International Journal of Architectural Heritage. ,vol. 2, pp. 353- 376 ,(2008) , 10.1080/15583050701828178
Rogiros Illampas, Dimos C. Charmpis, Ioannis Ioannou, Laboratory testing and finite element simulation of the structural response of an adobe masonry building under horizontal loading Engineering Structures. ,vol. 80, pp. 362- 376 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2014.09.008
Pere Roca, Miguel Cervera, Giuseppe Gariup, Luca Pela’, Structural Analysis of Masonry Historical Constructions. Classical and Advanced Approaches Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. ,vol. 17, pp. 299- 325 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11831-010-9046-1
Dina D’Ayala, Sergio Lagomarsino, Performance-based assessment of cultural heritage assets: outcomes of the European FP7 PERPETUATE project Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. ,vol. 13, pp. 5- 12 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10518-014-9710-1
Sergio Lagomarsino, Andrea Penna, Alessandro Galasco, Serena Cattari, TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings Engineering Structures. ,vol. 56, pp. 1787- 1799 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2013.08.002