A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements.

作者: Chandur Wadhwani , Timothy Hess , Thomas Faber , Alfonso Piñeyro , Curtis S.K. Chen

DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60062-5

关键词:

摘要: Statement of problem Cementation implant prostheses is a common practice. Excess cement in the gingival sulcus may harm periodontal tissues. Identification excess be possible with use radiographs if has sufficient radiopacity. Purpose The purpose this study was to compare radiographic density different cements used for prostheses. Material and methods Eight were compared: TempBond Original (TBO), NE (TBN), Fleck's (FL), Dycal (DY), RelyX Unicem (RXU), Luting (RXL), Improv (IM), Premier Implant Cement (PIC). Specimen disks, 2 mm thickness, radiographed. Images made using photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates standardized exposure values. average grey level central area each specimen disk selected measured pixels software analysis program, ImageTool, providing an value representative radiodensity 8 cements. determined values test materials, which recorded compared standard aluminum step wedge. An equivalent thickness millimeters calculated best straight line fit estimates. To assess contrast effects by varying settings, second experiment 1-mm-thick specimens radiographed at both 60 kVp 70 conducted. PSP comparison wedge, same program. Results highest zinc (TBO, TBN, FL), 1-mm detectable 60- 70-kVp settings. A lower DY, indicative cements, but higher than RXL RXU. implant-specific had lowest IM could only detected 2-mm-thick sections equivalence previously mentioned PIC not radiographically either or 2-mm thicknesses Conclusions Some types commonly cementation implant-supported have poor following examination.

参考文章(24)
R. C. Fraga, L. R. L. Luca-Fraga, L. A. F. Pimenta, Physical properties of resinous cements: an in vitro study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. ,vol. 27, pp. 1064- 1067 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1365-2842.2000.00657.X
Karina Lopes Devito, Ana Isabel Ortega, Francisco Haiter-Neto, None, Radiopacity of calcium hydroxide cement compared with human tooth structure Journal of Applied Oral Science. ,vol. 12, pp. 290- 293 ,(2004) , 10.1590/S1678-77572004000400007
Ahmed Mansour, Carlo Ercoli, Gerald Graser, Ross Tallents, Mark Moss, Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 343- 348 ,(2002) , 10.1034/J.1600-0501.2002.130401.X
S K Chen, L Hollender, K A Omnell, Detection of small differences in mass using a direct digital dental X-ray system Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. ,vol. 26, pp. 63- 66 ,(1997) , 10.1038/SJ.DMFR.4600202
Hans P Weber, David M Kim, Mavis W Ng, Jae W Hwang, Joseph P Fiorellini, None, Peri‐implant soft‐tissue health surrounding cement‐ and screw‐retained implant restorations: a multi‐center, 3‐year prospective study Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 17, pp. 375- 379 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1600-0501.2005.01232.X
Carlos José Soares, Fernanda Ribeiro Santana, Rodrigo Borges Fonseca, Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins, Francisco Haiter Neto, In vitro analysis of the radiodensity of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs. Clinical Oral Investigations. ,vol. 11, pp. 331- 336 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S00784-007-0130-3
Chandur Wadhwani, Alfonso Piñeyro, Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 102, pp. 57- 58 ,(2009) , 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60102-5
Stephen F. Rosenstiel, Martin F. Land, Bruce J. Crispin, Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 80, pp. 280- 301 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3
S GU, B RASIMICK, A DEUTSCH, B MUSIKANT, Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system Dental Materials. ,vol. 22, pp. 765- 770 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2005.11.004