Rape Myth Acceptance and Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Multidimensional Analysis

作者: Barbara E. Johnson , Douglas L. Kuck , Patricia R. Schander

DOI: 10.1023/A:1025671021697

关键词:

摘要: Many myths have been identified surrounding rape, rapists, and rape victims. This study reexamines the acceptance of across gender role ideologies selected demographic characteristics to identify core myths. Three myth categories were established investigated: blaming woman, excusing man, justifications for acquaintance rape. Findings indicate that remain prevalent adherence is related factors attitudes. Overall, respondents tend excuse man more than blame woman. Males accept females. Racial differences emerged most strongly on dimension. Individuals with a conservative ideology believe those liberal ideologies. While did not emerge from data, revealing finding summative scaling techniques used in previous studies may mask important differences, between within three dimensions, among groups studied.

参考文章(12)
Michael S. Pallak, Suzanne R. Sogin, Arvin Van Zante, Bad decisions: Effect of volition, locus of causality, and negative consequences on attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 30, pp. 217- 227 ,(1974) , 10.1037/H0036641
David J. Giacopassi, R. Thomas Dull, Gender and Racial Differences in the Acceptance of Rape Myths Within a College Population Sex Roles. ,vol. 15, pp. 63- 75 ,(1986) , 10.1007/BF00287532
Hubert S. Feild, Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 36, pp. 156- 179 ,(1978) , 10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.156
Lynda A. Szymanski, Ann Sloan Devlin, Joan C. Chrisler, Stuart A. Vyse, Gender Role and Attitudes toward Rape in Male and Female College Students. Sex Roles. ,vol. 29, pp. 37- 57 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF00289995
Kimberly A. Lonsway, Louise F. Fitzgerald, Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 68, pp. 704- 711 ,(1995) , 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704
Sheila R. Deitz, Madeleine Littman, Brenda J. Bentley, Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness Sex Roles. ,vol. 10, pp. 261- 280 ,(1984) , 10.1007/BF00287780
Kimberly A. Lonsway, Louise F. Fitzgerald, Rape Myths In Review Psychology of Women Quarterly. ,vol. 18, pp. 133- 164 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1471-6402.1994.TB00448.X
Martha R. Burt, Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 38, pp. 217- 230 ,(1980) , 10.1037//0022-3514.38.2.217
Charlene L. Muehlenhard, Debra E. Friedman, Celeste M. Thomas, Is Date Rape Justifiable?: The Effects of Dating Activity, Who Initiated, Who Paid, and Men's Attitudes toward Women Psychology of Women Quarterly. ,vol. 9, pp. 297- 310 ,(1985) , 10.1111/J.1471-6402.1985.TB00882.X