作者: John D. Coie , Christina Christopoulos , Robert Terry , Kenneth A. Dodge , John E. Lochman
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2442-0_14
关键词:
摘要: The phrase social competence has been used in the literature to refer two separate lines of research. first line focused on development and maintenance close friendships (Berndt, 1986; Furman, 1982, 1985; Gottman, 1983; Gottman & Parker, Selman, 1981; Youniss, 1980) second ability interact effectively a more general environment, like peer group (Asher Coie, press; Asher Hymel, Dodge, Coppotelli, 1982; Hartup, Glazer, Charlesworth, 1967; Putallaz 1981). Such differentiation reflects researchers’ acknowledgment that both areas are important components competence. At same time, it indicates their awareness relations may be quite distinct nature function. Furman (1985), for example, proposed intimacy, affection, loyalty, availability primarily obtained context friendships, whereas sense inclusion is likely develop within relations. In present chapter, we will focus side competence, discuss some aspects poor appear particularly problematic or predictive adjustment problems later life.