Integrating exhaled breath diagnostics by disease-sniffing dogs with instrumental laboratory analysis.

作者: Joachim Pleil , Roger Giese

DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/AA79BC

关键词:

摘要: Dogs have been studied for many years as a medical diagnostic tool to detect pre-clinical disease state by sniffing emissions directly from human or an in vitro biological sample. Some of the studies report high sensitivity and specificity blinded case-control studies. However, these it is completely unknown which suites chemicals dogs how they ultimately interpret this information amidst confounding background odors. Herein, we consider advantages challenges canine olfaction early (meaningful) detection cancer, propose experimental concept narrow molecular signals used dog sample classification laboratory-based instrumental analysis. This serves two purposes; first, contrast dogs, analytical methods could be quickly up-scaled throughput sampling. Second, knowledge gained identifying probative helpful learning more about biochemical pathways progression. We focus on exhaled breath aerosol, arguing that semi-volatile fraction should given attention. Ultimately, conclude interaction between dog-based instrument-based research will mutually beneficial accelerate progress towards cancer

参考文章(36)
Charles F. Sloane, Dogs in War, Police Work and on Patrol Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. ,vol. 46, pp. 385- ,(1955) , 10.2307/1139438
Poguang Wang, Qi Zhang, Yuanyuan Yao, Roger W. Giese, Cationic Xylene Tag for Increasing Sensitivity in Mass Spectrometry Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. ,vol. 26, pp. 1713- 1721 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S13361-015-1200-4
Andras Bikov, Zsófia Lázár, Ildiko Horvath, None, Established methodological issues in electronic nose research: how far are we from using these instruments in clinical settings of breath analysis? Journal of Breath Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 034001- 034001 ,(2015) , 10.1088/1752-7155/9/3/034001
Tadeusz Jezierski, Marta Walczak, Tomasz Ligor, Joanna Rudnicka, Bogusław Buszewski, Study of the art: canine olfaction used for cancer detection on the basis of breath odour. Perspectives and limitations Journal of Breath Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 027001- 027001 ,(2015) , 10.1088/1752-7155/9/2/027001
Etzioni Ruth, Urban Nicole, Ramsey Scott, M Martin, Schwartz Stephen, Reid Brian, Radich Jerald, Anderson Garnet, Hartwell Leland, THE CASE FOR EARLY DETECTION Nature Reviews Cancer. ,vol. 3, pp. 243- 252 ,(2003) , 10.1038/NRC1041
Kevin R Elliker, Barbara A Sommerville, Donald M Broom, David E Neal, Sarah Armstrong, Hywel C Williams, Key considerations for the experimental training and evaluation of cancer odour detection dogs: lessons learnt from a double-blind, controlled trial of prostate cancer detection BMC Urology. ,vol. 14, pp. 22- 22 ,(2014) , 10.1186/1471-2490-14-22
H.T. Nagle, R. Gutierrez-Osuna, S.S. Schiffman, The how and why of electronic noses IEEE Spectrum. ,vol. 35, pp. 22- 31 ,(1998) , 10.1109/6.715180
Wolfgang Schroeder, Volatile S-nitrosothiols and the typical smell of cancer. Journal of Breath Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 016010- ,(2015) , 10.1088/1752-7155/9/1/016010
Dorothea Johnen, Wolfgang Heuwieser, Carola Fischer-Tenhagen, Canine scent detection—Fact or fiction? Applied Animal Behaviour Science. ,vol. 148, pp. 201- 208 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2013.09.002