Comparison of plasma pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of ceftiofur sodium in cattle after a single intramuscular or subcutaneous injection

作者: S. A. Brown , S. T. Chester , A. K. Speedy , V. L. Hubbard , J. K. Callahan

DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2885.2000.00271.X

关键词:

摘要: Ceftiofur sodium, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, is active against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens of veterinary importance. This study was designed to compare the bioequivalence sodium salt in cattle after single intramuscular (i.m.) or subcutaneous dose (s.c.) 2.2 mg ceftiofur equivalents/kg body weight. The criteria used evaluate were (1) area under curve from time injection limit quantitation (LOQ) assay (AUC0-LOQ), (2) concentrations remained above 0.2 microg/mL (t>0.2). Twelve crossbred beef enrolled three-period, two-treatment crossover trial, with minimum 2-week washout period between doses equivalents/kg. Blood samples collected serially for up 72 h post-injection. Plasma then analyzed using validated that measures ceftiofur, all desfuroylceftiofur-related metabolites, by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as stable derivative, desfuroylceftiofur acetamide. A maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) 13.9+/-3.55 observed 0. 67-2.0 i.m. administration, whereas Cmax 13.6+/-3.85 0.67-3.0 s.c. administration. AUC0-LOQ 108+/-35.0 microg. h/mL dosing, compared 105+/-29.8 dosing. pre-established criterion equivalence routes administration satisfied. t>0.2 49.2+/-8.55 47.0+/-9.40 equivalents (CE)/kg suggest similar therapeutic efficacy systemic safety two

参考文章(8)
Prem S Jaglan, Byron L Cox, Thomas S Arnold, Marc F Kubicek, Dorothy J Stuart, Terry J Gilbertson, Liquid chromatographic determination of desfuroylceftiofur metabolite of ceftiofur as residue in cattle plasma. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. ,vol. 73, pp. 26- 30 ,(1990) , 10.1093/JAOAC/73.1.26
Harry Eagle, Ralph Fleischman, Mina Levy, Continuous vs. Discontinuous Therapy with Penicillin New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 248, pp. 481- 488 ,(1953) , 10.1056/NEJM195303192481201
L R Peterson, D N Gerding, J A Moody, C E Fasching, Comparison of azlocillin, ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, and amikacin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neutropenic-site rabbit model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. ,vol. 25, pp. 545- 552 ,(1984) , 10.1128/AAC.25.5.545
K. Joiner, B. Lowe, J. Dzink, J. G. Bartlett, Comparative Efficacy of 10 Antimicrobial Agents in Experimental Infections with Bacteroides fragllis The Journal of Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 145, pp. 561- 568 ,(1982) , 10.1093/INFDIS/145.4.561
L. V. Friedrich, R. L. White, M. B. Kays, V. E. Del Bene, Evaluation of cephalosporins/cephamycins with antianaerobic activity by integrating microbiologic and pharmacokinetic properties. Clinical Therapeutics. ,vol. 13, pp. 596- 605 ,(1991)
Kinney Ml, Yancey Rj, Goodenough Kr, Roberts Bj, Hamel Jc, Ford Cw, Ceftiofur sodium, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin: evaluation in vitro and in vivo in mice. American Journal of Veterinary Research. ,vol. 48, pp. 1050- 1053 ,(1987)