Exploitation scenarios in industrial system LCA

作者: François Cluzel , Bernard Yannou , Dominique Millet , Yann Leroy

DOI: 10.1007/S11367-013-0631-Z

关键词:

摘要: Purpose: This paper considers the variabilities that exist in exploitation of a complex industrial system. Our scenario-based LCA model ensures reliability results situations where system life cycle is very uncertain, there substantial lack data and/or time and resources available are limited. It also an effective tool to generate recommendations for clients. Method: Existing quantitative uncertainty methods require huge amount accurate data. These rarely simplified upstream systems. A approach best compromise between acceptable quality required. However, such have not yet been proposed improve environmental knowledge case scenarios. The method here limited number scenarios (3 or 4) defined using Stanford Research Institute (SRI) matrix. Using from past projects, relevant parts listed, expert parameters associated with these quantified. classical process then provides different Results discussion: was applied Alstom Grid AC/DC conversion substation primary aluminium industry. previous study had scope, as poorly understood. Relevant were thus clearly identified: spare program, transport failures, preventive corrective maintenance, updates revampings, lifetime modulation end-of-life. Four considered: case, worst baseline (expected future) highly alternative. show pertinence considering several when predictable, impacts may vary widely one another. sensitivity analysis shows some revampings will need be carefully considered futures studies. Conclusions: consideration three (best case) appears extremely pertinent systems high uncertainties resources. useful good practice towards clients, initiating dialog centred on eco-design continuous improvement.

参考文章(28)
Yasuhiro Fukushima, Masahiko Hirao, A structured framework and language for scenario-based Life Cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 317- 329 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF02978679
Joseph F. Coates, Seven tomorrows Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 23, pp. 207- 208 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0040-1625(83)90055-0
Anne Marsden, Amy Shahtout, International Organization for Standardization American Society of Microbiology. pp. 447- 450 ,(2014) , 10.1128/9781555817282.CH22
Wolter J. Fabrycky, Benjamin S. Blanchard, Systems engineering and analysis ,(1981)
John Reap, Felipe Roman, Scott Duncan, Bert Bras, A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 290- 300 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11367-008-0008-X
Mattias Höjer, Sofia Ahlroth, Karl-Henrik Dreborg, Tomas Ekvall, Göran Finnveden, Olof Hjelm, Elisabeth Hochschorner, Måns Nilsson, Viveka Palm, Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 16, pp. 1958- 1970 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2008.01.008
Albert Weckenmann, Achim Schwan, Environmental life cycle assessment with support of fuzzy-sets International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 6, pp. 13- 18 ,(2001) , 10.1007/BF02977589
Hanna -Leena Pesonen, Tomas Ekvall, Günter Fleischer, Gjalt Huppes, Christina Jahn, Zbigniew S. Klos, Gerald Rebitzer, Guido W. Sonnemann, Alberto Tintinelli, Bo P. Weidema, Henrik Wenzel, Framework for scenario development in LCA International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 5, pp. 21- 30 ,(2000) , 10.1007/BF02978555
Mark A. J. Huijbregts, A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 3, pp. 273- 280 ,(1998) , 10.1007/BF02979835
Gang Liu, Daniel B. Müller, Addressing sustainability in the aluminum industry: a critical review of life cycle assessments Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 35, pp. 108- 117 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.05.030