作者: Carol A. E. Nickerson , Gary H. McClelland , Doreen M. Petersen
DOI: 10.1007/BF00845454
关键词:
摘要: Previous assessments of individuals' values for various contraceptive consequences have employed one four methodologies: free elicitation, direct ratings, multiple regression, or factor analysis. All methodologies are flawed because they produce group rather than individual values, rely on rating scales, and fail to incorporate information regarding consequence trade-offs. Axiomatic conjoint measurement is proposed as an alternative methodology used determine a selected set at two stages the family-planning career.