A randomized controlled trial of 0.5% ferric hyaluronate gel (Intergel) in the prevention of adhesions following abdominal surgery.

作者: Choong-Leong Tang , David G. Jayne , Francis Seow-Choen , Yen-Yee Ng , Kong-Weng Eu

DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000207837.71831.A2

关键词:

摘要: Peritoneal adhesion is an inevitable consequence of abdominal surgery and a cause significant postoperative morbidity. They predispose to recurrent episodes pain intestinal obstruction that frequently require hospitalization.1,2 This adds the financial burden placed on healthcare system adversely affects quality life.3,4 Much interest has been focused reducing incidence adhesions. Simple approaches include use unpowdered gloves, generous irrigation peritoneum with distilled water or normal saline after surgery, addition anti-inflammatory agents into wash. Such measures have not very effective.5 A number therapeutic shown potential promise, including antiadhesive membranes (INTERCEED Absorbable Adhesion Barrier, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ; Preclude Surgical Membrane, W.L. Gore Co.; Seprafilm Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) may be laid localized areas peritoneum; viscous gels (Hyskon, Pharmacia, Piscataway, Sepracoat, Genzyme) instilled peritoneal cavity. Although gel formulations theoretical advantage formation throughout cavity, some preparations associated undesirable side effects because their oncotic nature resulting in ascites.6 In addition, gravitational pooling limit effectiveness following certain types surgery.5 A new preparation, Intergel (Lifecore Biomedical Inc., Chaska, MN), introduced uses formulation naturally occurring polysaccharide, hyaluronic acid (HA). Cross-linkage carboxylate groups HA molecules by chelation ferric (Fe3+) ions results lubricating preparation. Instillation cavity minimizes tissue apposition during critical period fibrin mesothelial regeneration. Lymphatic drainage appears major route elimination from estimated half-life 51 hours.7 HA-based reduce numerous animal studies.8–13 humans, randomized controlled trial involving promising pelvic gynecologic achieving 59% reduction formation.14 A was started at our institution evaluate role as agent open surgery. The suspended recruitment 32 patients occurrence adverse events treatment arm.

参考文章(25)
Larsen Jw, Stillman Rj, Jacobs Rj, Ray Nf, Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surgery gynecology & obstetrics. ,vol. 176, pp. 271- 276 ,(1993)
Gere S. diZerega, Contemporary adhesion prevention Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 61, pp. 219- 235 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56507-8
Holmdahl L, Ivarsson Ml, Franzén G, Risberg B, Cost of bowel obstruction resulting from adhesions. European Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 163, pp. 679- 684 ,(1997)
D Menzies, H Ellis, Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. ,vol. 72, pp. 60- 63 ,(1990)
H Osada, K Takahashi, TK Fujii, I Tsunoda, K Satoh, The effect of cross-linked hyaluronate hydrogel on the reduction of post-surgical adhesion reformation in rabbits. Journal of International Medical Research. ,vol. 27, pp. 233- 241 ,(1999) , 10.1177/030006059902700503
Douglas B. Johns, Kathleen E. Rodgers, William D. Donahue, Timothy C. Kiorpes, Gere S. diZerega, Reduction of adhesion formation by postoperative administration of ionically cross-linked hyaluronic acid* Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 68, pp. 37- 42 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81472-0
Per Falk, Helicobacter pylori colonisation of the human stomach--persistence at a price. European Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 167, pp. 12- 23 ,(2001) , 10.1080/110241501317076209
Richard E Leach M.D., James W Burns Ph.D., Elizabeth J Dawe D.V.M., Michelle D SmithBarbour B.S., Michael P Diamond M.D., Reduction of postsurgical adhesion formation in the rabbit uterine horn model with use of hyaluronate/ carboxymethylcellulose gel Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 69, pp. 415- 418 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00573-6