LAMPS, RAINBOWS AND HORIZONS

摘要: AbstractIn the present essay I address apparently problematic status of epistemology in F.W.J. Schelling’s work. Given (at times) overblown emphasis on anti-Kantianism, there would seem to be little hope articulating anything like a theory knowledge thought. For sake brevity emphasize knowledge’s spatial and navigational functions texts. Schelling, is that which locates, constructively constrains, capacity subject synthesize. This accomplished, argue, via spatialized reading concept intellectual intuition. While this form intuition initially resembles Fichte’s, Schelling transforms term, using it tandem with construction, order maintain both sensory immediacy, yet abstract form, as initial means knowing subject, immersed activities nature, comes recognize its own capacities begins claims about world.