Response rate and diagnostic accuracy of early PET-CT during neo-adjuvant therapies in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者: Kieran G. Foley , Jacqueline Jeffries , Clare Hannon , Bernadette Coles , Kevin M. Bradley

DOI: 10.1111/IJCP.13906

关键词:

摘要: PURPOSE Only 25% of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) patients have a pathological response to neo-adjuvant therapy (NAT) before oesophagectomy. Early assessment using PET imaging may help guide management these patients. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis synthesise the evidence detailing rate diagnostic accuracy early PET-CT assessment. METHODS systematically searched several databases including MEDLINE Embase. Studies with mixed cohorts histology, tumour location repeat after more than one cycle NAT were excluded. Reference standard was defined by Becker or Mandard classifications. Primary outcome metabolic reduction in maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) 35%. Secondary treatment prediction, as sensitivity specificity this threshold. Quality also assessed. Random-effects pooled rates accuracy. This study registered PROSPERO (CRD42019147034). RESULTS Overall, 1341 articles screened, 6 studies eligible for analysis. These reported data 518 (aged 27-78 years; 452 [87.3%] men) between 2005 2020. Pooled predict 77.2% (95% CI 53.2%-100%). Significant heterogeneity existed (I2  = 80.6% 38.9%-93.8%), P = .006). 75.0% 68.2%-82.5%), however, no significant  = 0.0% 0.0%-67.4%), P = .73). CONCLUSION High-quality is lacking, few met inclusion criteria review. The SUVmax threshold 35% suboptimal varied widely. However, consistent across 75.0%, suggesting better predictor resistance than of pathological response. Further research required define optimal PET-guided decisions OAC.

参考文章(60)
Wolfgang A. Weber, Katja Ott, Karen Becker, Hans-Joachim Dittler, Hermann Helmberger, Norbert E. Avril, Günther Meisetschläger, Raymonde Busch, Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert, Markus Schwaiger, Ulrich Fink, Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction by Metabolic Imaging Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 19, pp. 3058- 3065 ,(2001) , 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.12.3058
Joel Shapiro, J Jan B van Lanschot, Maarten C C M Hulshof, Pieter van Hagen, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen, Geke A P Hospers, Johannes J Bonenkamp, Miguel A Cuesta, Reinoud J B Blaisse, Olivier R C Busch, Fiebo J W ten Kate, Geert-Jan M Creemers, Cornelis J A Punt, John Th M Plukker, Henk M W Verheul, Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen, Herman van Dekken, Maurice J C van der Sangen, Tom Rozema, Katharina Biermann, Jannet C Beukema, Anna H M Piet, Caroline M van Rij, Janny G Reinders, Hugo W Tilanus, Ewout W Steyerberg, Ate van der Gaast, Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial The Lancet Oncology. ,vol. 16, pp. 1090- 1098 ,(2015) , 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6
Anne-Marie Mandard, Frédéric Dalibard, Jean-Claude Mandard, Jacques Marnay, Michel Henry-Amar, Jean-François Petiot, Alain Roussel, Jacques-Henry Jacob, Philippe Segol, Guy Samama, Jean-Marie Ollivier, Sylvie Bonvalot, Marc Gignoux, Pathologic Assessment of Tumor Regression After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Carcinoma. Clinicopathologic Correlations Cancer. ,vol. 73, pp. 2680- 2686 ,(1994) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2680::AID-CNCR2820731105>3.0.CO;2-C
F De Vita, M Orditura, E Martinelli, L Vecchione, R Innocenti, V C Sileni, C Pinto, M Di Maio, A Farella, T Troiani, F Morgillo, V Napolitano, E Ancona, N Di Martino, A Ruol, G Galizia, A Del Genio, F Ciardiello, A multicenter phase II study of induction chemotherapy with FOLFOX-4 and cetuximab followed by radiation and cetuximab in locally advanced oesophageal cancer British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 104, pp. 427- 432 ,(2011) , 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6606093
R. S. Gillies, M. R. Middleton, N. D. Maynard, K. M. Bradley, F. V. Gleeson, Additional benefit of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the staging of oesophageal cancer European Radiology. ,vol. 21, pp. 274- 280 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S00330-010-1943-Z
Florian Lordick, Katja Ott, Bernd-Joachim Krause, Wolfgang A Weber, Karen Becker, Hubert J Stein, Sylvie Lorenzen, Tibor Schuster, Hinrich Wieder, Ken Herrmann, Rainer Bredenkamp, Heinz Höfler, Ulrich Fink, Christian Peschel, Markus Schwaiger, Jörg R Siewert, PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncology. ,vol. 8, pp. 797- 805 ,(2007) , 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70244-9
Yu-mei Chen, Xu-feng Pan, Lin-jun Tong, Yi-ping Shi, Tao Chen, Can 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predict responses to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal cancer patients? A meta-analysis Nuclear Medicine Communications. ,vol. 32, pp. 1005- 1010 ,(2011) , 10.1097/MNM.0B013E32834A8366
M. van Heijl, S.S.K.S. Phoa, M.I. van Berge Henegouwen, J.M.T. Omloo, B.M. Mearadji, G.W. Sloof, P.M.M. Bossuyt, M.C.C.M. Hulshof, D.J. Richel, J.J.G.H.M. Bergman, F.J.W. ten Kate, J. Stoker, J.J.B. van Lanschot, Accuracy and reproducibility of 3D-CT measurements for early response assessment of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer. Ejso. ,vol. 37, pp. 1064- 1071 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.EJSO.2011.09.004