Multidisciplinary collaboration in primary care: a systematic review.

作者: Cecilia Saint-Pierre , Valeria Herskovic , Marcos Sepúlveda

DOI: 10.1093/FAMPRA/CMX085

关键词:

摘要: Background Several studies have discussed the benefits of multidisciplinary collaboration in primary care. However, what remains unclear is how undertaken a manner concrete terms. Objective To identify teams care collaborate, regards to professionals involved and collaborative activities that take place, determine whether these characteristics practices are present across disciplines affects clinical outcomes. Methods A systematic literature review past research, using MEDLINE, ScienceDirect Web Science databases. Results Four types team composition were identified: specialized teams, highly doctor-nurse-pharmacist triad physician-nurse centred teams. within co-located collaboration, non-hierarchical through shared consultations via referral counter-referral. Two combinations commonly repeated: specialist Fifty-two per cent articles reported positive results when comparing against non-collaborative alternative, whereas 16% showed no difference 32% did not comparison. Conclusion Overall, was found be or neutral every study compared with alternative. typology based on objective measures devised, contrast typologies involve interviews, perception-based questionnaires other subjective instruments.

参考文章(130)
Carter Thorne, Lorna Bain, Sandra Mierdel, Modeling best practices in chronic disease management: the Arthritis Program at Southlake Regional Health Centre. Journal of allied health. ,vol. 41, ,(2012)
Timothy D Shortus, Suzanne H McKenzie, Lynn A Kemp, Judith G Proudfoot, Mark F Harris, Multidisciplinary care plans for diabetes: how are they used? The Medical Journal of Australia. ,vol. 187, pp. 78- 81 ,(2007) , 10.5694/J.1326-5377.2007.TB01144.X
Yolanda Reid Chassiakos, Louis Rubino, Brenda Freshman, Collaboration Across the Disciplines in Health Care ,(2009)
Elizabeth V. Eikey, Madhu C. Reddy, Craig E. Kuziemsky, Examining the role of collaboration in studies of health information technologies in biomedical informatics Journal of Biomedical Informatics. ,vol. 57, pp. 263- 277 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JBI.2015.08.006
Judith M. Pechacek, Diana Drake, Carrie Ann Terrell, Carolyn Torkelson, Interprofessional Intervention to Support Mature Women: A Case Study. Creative Nursing. ,vol. 21, pp. 134- 143 ,(2015) , 10.1891/1078-4535.21.3.134
Julie S. Abramson, Terry Mizrahi, Understanding collaboration between social workers and physicians: application of a typology. Social Work in Health Care. ,vol. 37, pp. 71- 100 ,(2003) , 10.1300/J010V37N02_04
Hideya Sakakibara, Hiroshi Yoshida, Maki Takei, Yukiko Katsuhata, Makiko Koyama, Tomoko Nagata, Masahiko Ishikawa, Fumiki Hirahara, Health management of adults with Turner Syndrome: An attempt at multidisciplinary medical care by gynecologists in cooperation with specialists from other fields Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. ,vol. 37, pp. 836- 842 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1447-0756.2010.01448.X
Steven R. Counsell, Christopher M. Callahan, Amna B. Buttar, Daniel O. Clark, Kathryn I. Frank, Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders (GRACE): a new model of primary care for low-income seniors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. ,vol. 54, pp. 1136- 1141 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1532-5415.2006.00791.X
Robin Williams, Jean Clinton, Anne Biscaro, Ontario and the enhanced 18-month well-baby visit: Trying new approaches. Paediatrics and Child Health. ,vol. 13, pp. 850- 856 ,(2008) , 10.1093/PCH/13.10.850