Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines: How Readable Are Internet-Based Patient Education Resources?

作者: David Richard Hansberry , Michael D. White , Michael D'Angelo , Arpan V. Prabhu , Sarah Kamel

DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.19042

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE. Following the findings of National Lung Screening Trial, several national societies from multiple disciplines have endorsed use low-dose chest CT to screen for lung cancer. Online patient education materials are an important tool disseminate information general public regarding proven health benefits cancer screening. This study aims evaluate reading level at which these related screening written. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The four terms “pulmonary nodule,” “radiation,” “low-dose CT,” and “lung screening” were searched on Google, first 20 online resources each term downloaded, converted into plain text, analyzed using 10 well-established readability scales. If websites not written specifically patients, they excluded. RESULTS. 80 articles a 12.6 ± 2.7 (mean SD) grade level, with levels ranging 4.0 19.0. Of articles, 62.5% required high scho...

参考文章(30)
G. Harry McLaughlin, SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula. The Journal of Reading. ,(1969)
Edgar Dale, Jeanne Sternlicht Chall, Readability revisited : the new Dale-Chall readability formula ,(1995)
Thomas G. Sticht, John S. Caylor, Lynn C. Fox, J. Patrick Ford, Methodologies for Determining Reading Requirements Military Occupational Specialties. ,(1973)
Robert Gunning, The Technique of Clear Writing. ,(1968)
Carolyn Clark Mohrmann, Jeanne K. Heard PhD, Mary J. Cantrell Ma, RN Janet E. Lord PhD, Sharon K. Coon Mnsc, Rn, Aocn, Elizabeth Ann Coleman Phd, Rnp, Aocn, Elizabeth C. Burks Ma, An analysis of printed breast cancer information for African American women Journal of Cancer Education. ,vol. 15, pp. 23- 27 ,(2009) , 10.1080/08858190009528648
Tetine Sentell, Kathryn L. Braun, James Davis, Terry Davis, Health literacy and meeting breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among Asians and whites in California SpringerPlus. ,vol. 4, pp. 432- 432 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S40064-015-1225-Y
Rudolph Flesch, A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 32, pp. 221- 233 ,(1948) , 10.1037/H0057532
David R. Hansberry, Nitin Agarwal, Stephen R. Baker, Health literacy and online educational resources: an opportunity to educate patients. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 204, pp. 111- 116 ,(2015) , 10.2214/AJR.14.13086
David R Hansberry, Ann John, Elizabeth John, Nitin Agarwal, Sharon F Gonzales, Stephen R Baker, None, A Critical Review of the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources From RadiologyInfo.Org American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 202, pp. 566- 575 ,(2014) , 10.2214/AJR.13.11223
David R. Hansberry, Tekchand Ramchand, Shyam Patel, Carl Kraus, Jin Jung, Nitin Agarwal, Sharon F. Gonzales, Stephen R. Baker, Are we failing to communicate? Internet-based patient education materials and radiation safety. European Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 83, pp. 1698- 1702 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EJRAD.2014.04.013