A Critique of Mihir Shah Committee (2016) Report on Water Reforms in India
作者： M. Dinesh Kumar
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814903-4.00005-1
关键词:
摘要: The recommendations of Mihir Shah Committee on the restructuring India’s premier central water sector agencies, namely, Central Water Commission and Ground Board, do not echo any sound understanding administration in India, performance problems confronting it. “paradigm shift” approach to management challenges India suggested by report, which are based flawed analysis outdated concepts, merely reflects professional bias wishful thinking its members.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(26)
Douglas L. Vermillion, Impacts of irrigation management transfer: a review of the evidence IWMI Research Reports. ,(1997)
M Dinesh Kumar, Managing Water in River Basins: Hydrology, Economics and Institutions ,(2010)
R. Maria Saleth, Water institutions in India: Economics, law and policy ,(1996)
M. Dinesh Kumar, Thirsty Cities: How Indian Cities Can Meet their Water Needs ,(2014)
Sylvie Guichard, How Autonomous are the Branches? A study of Narendra Modi's BJP Economic and Political Weekly. ,vol. 48, pp. 40- 46 ,(2014)
Bharat R. Sharma, Sanmugam A. Prathapar, Pramod K. Aggarwal, Hydro, hydrogeological constraints to managed aquifer recharge in the Indo Gangetic Plains. IWMI-Tata Water Policy Research Highlight. ,(2012)
H. Kulkarni, P. S. V. Shankar, Groundwater: towards an aquifer management framework. Economic and Political Weekly. ,vol. 44, pp. 13- 17 ,(2009)
David Blackbourn, The Conquest of Nature: Water, Landscape, and the Making of Modern Germany ,(2007)
M. Dinesh Kumar, O. P. Singh, Groundwater Management in India: Physical, Institutional and Policy Alternatives ,(2007)
Upali A. Amarasinghe, R.P. S. Malik, Bharat R. Sharma, Overcoming growing water scarcity: Exploring potential improvements in water productivity in India Natural Resources Forum. ,vol. 34, pp. 188- 199 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1477-8947.2010.01305.X