The economic consequences of regulatory accounting in the nuclear power industry: market reaction to plant abandonments

作者: Patricia J. Arnold , Rita Hartung Cheng

DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4254(00)00009-0

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Between 1972 and 1990, US electric utility companies cancelled orders for 117 nuclear power plants (NEI, 1996, pp. 1–6). The regulatory accounting methods adopted by rate setting commissions determined whether utilities could recover the losses on through higher rates. In effect, choice of how billions dollars invested in was allocated between stockholders, ratepayers, taxpayers (DOE/EIA, 1983, ix–x). Our paper examines economic consequences to stockholders capital project abandonments a regulated industry. results show that while treatment abandonment costs generally favorable investors, market reacted negatively announcements indicating investors did not expect fully recoup losses. Two stage regression is used investigate determinants market’s reaction cancellations.

参考文章(36)
Dennis C. Mueller, Public choice II Cambridge University Press. ,(1989)
Ray Ball, Clifford W. Smith, The Economics of accounting policy choice McGraw-Hill. ,(1992)
Gregg A. Jarrell, Pro-producer regulation and accounting for assets: The case of electric utilities☆ Journal of Accounting and Economics. ,vol. 1, pp. 93- 116 ,(1979) , 10.1016/0165-4101(79)90002-8
Walter G. Blacconiere, Marilyn F. Johnson, Mark S. Johnson, Stranded Costs and Competitive Forces in the Electric Utility Industry Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. ,vol. 12, pp. 199- 219 ,(1997) , 10.1177/0148558X9701200301
David Harvey, Globalization in Question ,(1996)
Erik Olin Wright, Class, crisis and the state ,(1978)
Myung-Sun Kim, William Kross, The impact of the 1989 change in bank capital standards on loan loss provisions and loan write-offs Journal of Accounting and Economics. ,vol. 25, pp. 69- 99 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00015-9
Karl A. Muller III, An examination of the voluntary recognition of acquired brand names in the United Kingdom Journal of Accounting and Economics. ,vol. 26, pp. 179- 191 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00035-4