The performance of biased-coin minimization in multicenter randomized clinical trials

作者: Li-Chuan Tu

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are widely used as the gold standard for comparative medical studies. Using randomization to determine treatment assignment assures that all patients have same chance of being assigned each group and groups comparable in terms distributions prognostic factors. When not comparable, power statistical test will be decreased. Moreover, problem imbalance becomes more notable when it occurs important factors because could result a significant bias assessing differences by group. The most intuitive simple form is complete randomization. However, with there still an on In order overcome using randomization, restricted procedures were proposed. some argued unintended consequence restrictions placed they create patterns allow prediction future allocation. Furthermore, questioned accuracy model-based inference conventional asymptotic under allocation. This dissertation concerned assessment performance biased-coin minimization. The twofold. first aspect balancing properties also probability predicting second compare results from classical test, log-rank based population model while minimization applied. Randomized research demonstrating efficacy therapies treat general community. Allocation methods promote balance key between assure validity trials. It assess dynamic allocation demonstrate these applied designed develop treatments enhance public health.

参考文章(25)
Vance W. Berger, Costas A. Christophi, Randomization Technique, Allocation Concealment, Masking, And Susceptibility Of Trials To Selection Bias Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. ,vol. 2, pp. 8- ,(2003) , 10.22237/JMASM/1051747680
John M. Lachin, William F. Rosenberger, Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice ,(2002)
D. G Altman, J M. Bland, How to randomise BMJ. ,vol. 319, pp. 703- 704 ,(1999) , 10.1136/BMJ.319.7211.703
D. F. Signorini, O. Leung, R. J. Simes, E. Beller, V. J. Gebski, T. Callaghan, Dynamic balanced randomization for clinical trials Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 2343- 2350 ,(1993) , 10.1002/SIM.4780122410
J. Hofmeijer, P.C. Anema, I. van der Tweel, New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 61, pp. 119- 124 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2007.04.002
John Ludbrook, Hugh Dudley, ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL STATISTICS: STATISTICAL INFERENCE Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 64, pp. 630- 636 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1445-2197.1994.TB02308.X
Richard Simon, Restricted randomization designs in clinical trials. Biometrics. ,vol. 35, pp. 503- ,(1979) , 10.2307/2530354
Leslie A. Kalish, Colin B. Begg, The impact of treatment allocation procedures on nominal significance levels and bias Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 8, pp. 121- 135 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90037-7
G. Kundt, Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures. Methods of Information in Medicine. ,vol. 48, pp. 129- 134 ,(2009) , 10.3414/ME0538
Marieke Perry, Miriam Faes, Miriam F. Reelick, Marcel G.M. Olde Rikkert, George F. Borm, Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 63, pp. 1118- 1122 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2009.11.014