摘要: This article reviews formal systems that regulate persuasion dialogues. In such dialogues two or more participants aim to resolve a difference of opinion, each trying persuade the other adopt their point view. Systems for dialogue have found application in various fields computer science, as non-monotonic logic, artificial intelligence and law, multi-agent systems, intelligent tutoring computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Taking game-theoretic view on this review proposes specification main elements then uses it critically some persuasion. The focus will be regulating interaction between agents rather than design behaviour individual within dialogue.
acm.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(54)
Simon Parsons, Peter McBurney, Argumentation-based communication between agents Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 164- 178 ,(2003) , 10.1007/978-3-540-44972-0_8
Maxime Morge, Computer-supported collaborative argumentation Fourth workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CNMA). ,(2004)
Alec Grierson, David Moore, Tangming Yuan, Dialogue Typology, Educational Human-computer Debate: a Computational Dialectics Approach ,(2002)
Ronald P. Loui, Jaap Hage, Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic. Law and Philosophy Library Artificial Intelligence and Law. ,vol. 8, pp. 353- 358 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1011274720031
Trevor J.M. Bench-Capon, Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game ,(1999)
Thomas F. Gordon, The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice ,(1995)
Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons, Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents Journal of Logic, Language and Information. ,vol. 11, pp. 315- 334 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1015586128739
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Douglas Walton, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning State University of New York Press. ,(1995)
Douglas N. Walton, Logical dialogue-games and fallacies ,(1984)