A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles

作者: Rafael T Mikolajczyk , Jun Zhang , Ana Pilar Betran , João Paulo Souza , Rintaro Mori

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60364-4

关键词:

摘要: Summary Background Definition of small for gestational age in various populations worldwide remains a challenge. References based on birthweight are deficient preterm births, those derived from ultrasound estimates might not be applicable to all populations, and the individualised reference can too complex use developing countries. Our aim was create generic fetal weight that overcame these deficiencies could readily adapted local populations. Methods We used fetal-weight developed by Hadlock colleagues notion proportionality proposed Gardosi made easily adjustable according mean at 40 weeks gestation any population. For application validation, we data 24 countries Africa, Latin America, Asia participated 2004–08 WHO Global Survey Maternal Perinatal Health (237 025 births). compared our with (non-customised) (individualised). every reference, odds ratio (OR) adverse perinatal outcomes (stillbirths, neonatal deaths, referral higher-level or special care unit, Apgar score lower than 7 5 min) infants who were versus estimated multilevel logistic regression. Findings OR 1·59 (95% CI 1·53–1·66) non-customised 2·87 (2·73–3·01) country-specific 2·84 (2·71–2·99) fully reference. Interpretation percentiles It has better ability predict is simpler without loss predictive ability. Funding None.

参考文章(28)
M Tashiro, F D Norris, R L Williams, W E Hawes, G C Cunningham, R K Creasy, Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 59, pp. 624- 632 ,(1982)
J Gardosi, B Clausson, A Francis, The value of customised centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 116, pp. 1356- 1363 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2009.02245.X
J Gardosi, B Clausson, A Francis, The use of customised versus population‐based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 114, pp. 1301- 1302 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2007.01432.X
J. Gardosi, Fetal growth: towards an international standard. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 26, pp. 112- 114 ,(2005) , 10.1002/UOG.1971
F. Figueras, E. Meler, A. Iraola, E. Eixarch, O. Coll, J. Figueras, A. Francis, E. Gratacos, J. Gardosi, Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. ,vol. 136, pp. 20- 24 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2006.12.015
Jason Gardosi, Ethnic differences in fetal growth Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 6, pp. 73- 74 ,(1995) , 10.1046/J.1469-0705.1995.06020073.X
Ann-Charlotte Smedler, Gerd Faxelius, Katarina Bremme, Monica Lagerström, Psychological development in children born with very low birth weight after severe intrauterine growth retardation: a 10‐year follow‐up study Acta Paediatrica. ,vol. 81, pp. 197- 203 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1651-2227.1992.TB12203.X
F. Figueras, J. Gardosi, Should We Customize Fetal Growth Standards Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. ,vol. 25, pp. 297- 303 ,(2009) , 10.1159/000235875
R. Verkauskiene, F. Figueras, S. Deghmoun, D. Chevenne, J. Gardosi, M. Levy-Marchal, Birth Weight and Long-Term Metabolic Outcomes: Does the Definition of Smallness Matter? Hormone Research in Paediatrics. ,vol. 70, pp. 309- 315 ,(2008) , 10.1159/000157878
Suneet P. Chauhan, Lata M. Gupta, Nancy W. Hendrix, Vincenzo Berghella, Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 200, pp. 409- 411 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2008.11.025